Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Scull"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
(QPQ review done)
imported>Yellow Dingo
(gtg)
Line 58: Line 58:
  
 
:* Thank you, [[User:Yellow Dingo|Yellow Dingo]]. QPQ now done. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 01:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 
:* Thank you, [[User:Yellow Dingo|Yellow Dingo]]. QPQ now done. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 01:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 +
:*:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go now. —&nbsp;'''[[User:Yellow Dingo|<b style="color:#FFCC33">Yellow</b> <b style="color:brown">Dingo</b>]]'''&#160;[[User talk:Yellow Dingo|<b style="color:BLUE">(talk)</b>]] 01:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:44, 9 November 2016

Robert Scull

  • ... that Robert Scull auction in 1973 of 50 Pop art works from his collection was viewed by the art establishment as the nouveaux riche cashing in? Source: "That auction, “The Collection of Robert C. Scull,” was the first of contemporary American art by a single seller. Its 50 lots of mostly Pop Art brought in $2.2 million (about $10.8 million in 2010 dollars), just above the high estimate, along with stunning evidence that the value of 1960s art would rise exponentially. It was immediately seen as a fall from grace for the Sculls — nouveaux riches cashing in — and the New York art world too." (and [1])

Created by Edwardx (talk) and Modernist (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC).


  • Symbol question.svg Some issues found.
    • This article is new and was created on 18:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2177 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has the following issues:
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • Symbol question.svg Some overall issues detected
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 139 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 1 characters
    • Edwardx has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.