Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Robin Preiss Glasser"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>January
(further comment)
imported>Sionk
(Okay, i'll hold my hands up, I made a mistake)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I make the copied text 1148 characters (please see [[User:January/sandbox|my sandbox]], where I copied what I think is the relevant text in order to count it), unfortunately with the article currently at 2450 characters it is too short. I haven't seen an example of an article rejected for this reason before so I'm not sure how strictly this is applied in practice, any second opinions would be appreciated. <font color="navy">[[User:January|January]]</font> <small>(<font color="navy">[[User talk:January|talk]]</font>)</small> 12:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I make the copied text 1148 characters (please see [[User:January/sandbox|my sandbox]], where I copied what I think is the relevant text in order to count it), unfortunately with the article currently at 2450 characters it is too short. I haven't seen an example of an article rejected for this reason before so I'm not sure how strictly this is applied in practice, any second opinions would be appreciated. <font color="navy">[[User:January|January]]</font> <small>(<font color="navy">[[User talk:January|talk]]</font>)</small> 12:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
  
 +
::::[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Fair enough, it didn't occur to me that the new article was inadmissable for those reasons. I've no intention (or scope) to expand it 5x. It was indeed inspired by the poorly sourced (a publisher's promotional page) paragraph in [[Fancy Nancy]]. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 13:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 13:41, 15 March 2014

Robin Preiss Glasser

Created by Sionk (talk). Self nominated at 18:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg This was created with text split from another article, according to Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide it has to have been expanded fivefold from the copied text to qualify. I'm still looking into this to determine what length the copied text was but I think it will fall short of a 5x expansion. January (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg I make the copied text 1148 characters (please see my sandbox, where I copied what I think is the relevant text in order to count it), unfortunately with the article currently at 2450 characters it is too short. I haven't seen an example of an article rejected for this reason before so I'm not sure how strictly this is applied in practice, any second opinions would be appreciated. January (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg Fair enough, it didn't occur to me that the new article was inadmissable for those reasons. I've no intention (or scope) to expand it 5x. It was indeed inspired by the poorly sourced (a publisher's promotional page) paragraph in Fancy Nancy. Sionk (talk) 13:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)