Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Roman Theatre at Apamea"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Zozo2kx
(reply to concerns)
imported>Peter I. Vardy
(OK by me)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:*That's a touch weaselly. Looking at both Finlayson references, I think the claim is justified, but currently supported by by only one of them. A bit of adding to the article (re the [[Theatre of Pompey]] in Rome, the only one clearly larger etc) would solve the problem, & it would benefit from it. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 18:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 
:*That's a touch weaselly. Looking at both Finlayson references, I think the claim is justified, but currently supported by by only one of them. A bit of adding to the article (re the [[Theatre of Pompey]] in Rome, the only one clearly larger etc) would solve the problem, & it would benefit from it. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 18:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 
::*Well, the "surviving" keyword rules out the Pompey theatre in Rome (and any others that we may not know about, e.g. Antioch). I rephrased the article to be like the hook (with the added detail about Ephesus). Do you think that works? [[User:Zozo2kx|Yazan]] ([[User talk:Zozo2kx|talk]]) 18:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 
::*Well, the "surviving" keyword rules out the Pompey theatre in Rome (and any others that we may not know about, e.g. Antioch). I rephrased the article to be like the hook (with the added detail about Ephesus). Do you think that works? [[User:Zozo2kx|Yazan]] ([[User talk:Zozo2kx|talk]]) 18:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 +
::::[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] That works for me. (I made "theatres" plural in the article). --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 19:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 19:03, 6 November 2012

Roman Theatre at Apamea

Created/expanded by Zozo2kx (talk). Self nom at 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg Date, length OK; article well-cited. Reference AGF. But the hook does not precisely reflect the wording of the article; inserting the word "considered" after "is" would remedy this. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) Also reviewing this. I agree with Peter. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • That's a touch weaselly. Looking at both Finlayson references, I think the claim is justified, but currently supported by by only one of them. A bit of adding to the article (re the Theatre of Pompey in Rome, the only one clearly larger etc) would solve the problem, & it would benefit from it. Johnbod (talk) 18:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, the "surviving" keyword rules out the Pompey theatre in Rome (and any others that we may not know about, e.g. Antioch). I rephrased the article to be like the hook (with the added detail about Ephesus). Do you think that works? Yazan (talk) 18:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting keep.svg That works for me. (I made "theatres" plural in the article). --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)