Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Calpe Hunt"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>VanishedUser kfljdfjsg33k
(reviewed 1)
imported>Prioryman
(Good to go)
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
:*'''Review 1''': [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Non-promotional, and no evidence of COI. Interesting hook, AGF on whether it's supported by the two sources given. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''&tilde;[[User:Danjel|danjel]]'''&nbsp;[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Danjel|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]]&nbsp;]</span> 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:*'''Review 1''': [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Non-promotional, and no evidence of COI. Interesting hook, AGF on whether it's supported by the two sources given. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''&tilde;[[User:Danjel|danjel]]'''&nbsp;[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Danjel|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]]&nbsp;]</span> 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
:*<!--Make first review here-->
 
 
:*'''Review 2''':
 
:*<!--Make second review here-->
 
  
 +
:*'''Review 2''': [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I had hoped to write this article myself but ACP2011 got there before me and did a better job than I could have! Length, date and sources are fine. I can confirm that the hook is supported, I have a hard copy of the Jackson book cited in the article. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 21:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:47, 27 December 2012

Royal Calpe Hunt

Royal Calpe Hunt

Created/expanded by ACP2011 (talk). Self nom at 14:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
  • Review 1: Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. Non-promotional, and no evidence of COI. Interesting hook, AGF on whether it's supported by the two sources given. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Review 2: Symbol confirmed.svg I had hoped to write this article myself but ACP2011 got there before me and did a better job than I could have! Length, date and sources are fine. I can confirm that the hook is supported, I have a hard copy of the Jackson book cited in the article. Prioryman (talk) 21:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)