Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/San Diego County Administration Center"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>MelanieN |
imported>MountainRail (Good to go) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | : | + | : [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] - The article is new enough, long enough, QPQ done, and either hook is fine, though I think the first is better. The image is fine. I am concerned, however, because there appears to be a lot of close paraphrasing in the article. For example: article: "It contains open grassy areas, a playground, shaded sitting areas, gardens, an interactive fountain and waterfront views.", source: "The space boasts large, open grassy areas, a playground, shaded sitting areas, gardens and an expansive interactive fountain."; article: "At the 1935 California Pacific International Exposition (World's Fair), plans for the building were hailed as a prototype of American civic center architecture.", source: "At the 1935 World’s Fair Exposition, plans for the San Diego City and County Administration Building were hailed as a prototype of American civic center architecture." There are other such instances of close paraphrasing or copying. Also, a few sentences do not have inline citations. Unless this is fixed, it doesn't meet DYK criteria. Thanks! [[User:MountainRail|MountainRail]] ([[User talk:MountainRail|talk]]) 23:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC) |
::Thanks for your suggestions. Two of us have worked to improve the sourcing and make sure there is no close paraphrasing. I hope this passes muster now. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | ::Thanks for your suggestions. Two of us have worked to improve the sourcing and make sure there is no close paraphrasing. I hope this passes muster now. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Excellent, thanks for your work! I reworded a few additional sentences and added a few refs, but this article looks good to go now. Thanks! [[User:MountainRail|MountainRail]] ([[User talk:MountainRail|talk]]) 14:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 12 June 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
San Diego County Administration Center
- ... that the San Diego County Administration Center (pictured) was dedicated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938 before a crowd of 25,000 people?
- ALT1: ... that the historic San Diego County Administration Center (pictured) was principally funded by the Works Progress Administration?
- Reviewed: The Indian Antiquary
Created by Keizers (talk). Nominated by MelanieN (talk) at 18:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC).
- 16px - The article is new enough, long enough, QPQ done, and either hook is fine, though I think the first is better. The image is fine. I am concerned, however, because there appears to be a lot of close paraphrasing in the article. For example: article: "It contains open grassy areas, a playground, shaded sitting areas, gardens, an interactive fountain and waterfront views.", source: "The space boasts large, open grassy areas, a playground, shaded sitting areas, gardens and an expansive interactive fountain."; article: "At the 1935 California Pacific International Exposition (World's Fair), plans for the building were hailed as a prototype of American civic center architecture.", source: "At the 1935 World’s Fair Exposition, plans for the San Diego City and County Administration Building were hailed as a prototype of American civic center architecture." There are other such instances of close paraphrasing or copying. Also, a few sentences do not have inline citations. Unless this is fixed, it doesn't meet DYK criteria. Thanks! MountainRail (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. Two of us have worked to improve the sourcing and make sure there is no close paraphrasing. I hope this passes muster now. --MelanieN (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- 16px - Excellent, thanks for your work! I reworded a few additional sentences and added a few refs, but this article looks good to go now. Thanks! MountainRail (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. Two of us have worked to improve the sourcing and make sure there is no close paraphrasing. I hope this passes muster now. --MelanieN (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
