Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Schmerber v. California"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>No Swan So Fine (reviewed, pass) |
imported>Mandarax m (rm {{DYKnom}} (self nom)) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
* {{DYKmake|Schmerber v. California|Notecardforfree|subpage=Schmerber v. California}} | * {{DYKmake|Schmerber v. California|Notecardforfree|subpage=Schmerber v. California}} | ||
| − | |||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 29 June 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Schmerber v. California
- ... that some scholars fear the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Schmerber v. California will one day be used to justify the involuntary mind reading of criminal suspects?
5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 09:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC).
Absolutely fascinating article and hook to back it up. 5X expansion within date, quality referencing and prose, length and QPQ satisfactory. Excellent piece of work. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)