Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Simone Téry"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Amakuru
(re)
imported>Amakuru
(remove approved symbol so bot does not pick this up)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] 5x expanded within the seven days preceding the nomination, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. {{u|Meanderingbartender}}, inserted the word "reputedly" into the hook to match the source and the article. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 01:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
+
:* 5x expanded within the seven days preceding the nomination, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. {{u|Meanderingbartender}}, inserted the word "reputedly" into the hook to match the source and the article. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 01:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] - the word "reputedly" should not appear in the hook, as it is a [[WP:WEASEL]] word, and is not attributable to anyone. Who did the reputing? The source is also slightly questionable, being an essay by a PhD student on the National Library of Ireland's blog. There seems to be a better source at [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EycjfJPrBAsC&pg=PA93], although this does not assert that she was the *only* journalist to interview him, just one of very few. Might I suggest rewording the article and the hook to reflect the verifiable assertion that she was one of very few?  — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 10:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] - the word "reputedly" should not appear in the hook, as it is a [[WP:WEASEL]] word, and is not attributable to anyone. Who did the reputing? The source is also slightly questionable, being an essay by a PhD student on the National Library of Ireland's blog. There seems to be a better source at [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EycjfJPrBAsC&pg=PA93], although this does not assert that she was the *only* journalist to interview him, just one of very few. Might I suggest rewording the article and the hook to reflect the verifiable assertion that she was one of very few?  — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 10:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:17, 14 May 2018

Simone Téry

  • ... that Simone Téry was reputedly the only journalist to ever interview the Irish revolutionary Micheal Collins? Source: "Téry is reputed to have been the only journalist, French or otherwise, to have ever interviewed Collins."[1])

Created by Meanderingbartender (talk). Self-nominated at 11:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC).

  • 5x expanded within the seven days preceding the nomination, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. Template:U, inserted the word "reputedly" into the hook to match the source and the article. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg - the word "reputedly" should not appear in the hook, as it is a WP:WEASEL word, and is not attributable to anyone. Who did the reputing? The source is also slightly questionable, being an essay by a PhD student on the National Library of Ireland's blog. There seems to be a better source at [2], although this does not assert that she was the *only* journalist to interview him, just one of very few. Might I suggest rewording the article and the hook to reflect the verifiable assertion that she was one of very few?  — Amakuru (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)