Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Southern Rhodesia Act 1965"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The C of E |
imported>Yoninah (restoring tick) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::::*I think you could pipe the link to some other wording. You could also rephrase the ending: "but it was largely ignored in the latter country/colony/state". [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC) | ::::*I think you could pipe the link to some other wording. You could also rephrase the ending: "but it was largely ignored in the latter country/colony/state". [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::::*I suppose it is a matter of personal choice, I personally prefer my wording so I will ask {{ping|Volcanoguy}} to restore the tick please. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<font color="red">The C of E </font><font color="blue"> God Save the Queen!</font>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]])</span> 20:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC) | :::::*I suppose it is a matter of personal choice, I personally prefer my wording so I will ask {{ping|Volcanoguy}} to restore the tick please. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<font color="red">The C of E </font><font color="blue"> God Save the Queen!</font>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]])</span> 20:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Restoring tick. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:27, 12 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 12 April 2018
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Southern Rhodesia Act 1965
Southern Rhodesian flag
Southern Rhodesian flag
- ... that the Southern Rhodesia Act 1965 was designed to affirm British rule in Southern Rhodesia (flag pictured) after their Unilateral Declaration of Independence, but it was largely ignored in Rhodesia? Source: Unlocking Constitutional and Administrative Law. Routledge. p. 160. ISBN 1444179624.
- Reviewed: Pythagoras
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 09:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC).
- 16px Article is new enough, long enough and within policy regarding neutrality, sourcing and close paraphrasing. Volcanoguy 02:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- 16pxTemplate:Ping the hook uses the word "Rhodesia" three times. Could you fix that? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Strictly speaking it only mentions Southern Rhodesia twice and Rhodesia once. I see no reason to change it as one is the name the act, the other is referencing the British colony and one is referring to the "rebel" state. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think you could pipe the link to some other wording. You could also rephrase the ending: "but it was largely ignored in the latter country/colony/state". Yoninah (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose it is a matter of personal choice, I personally prefer my wording so I will ask Template:Ping to restore the tick please. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
