Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/St. Lubentius, Dietkirchen"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Djflem
(DYKtickAGF)
imported>BlueMoonset
(adding missing sig to approval)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] looks ready to do, but the qpq is not yet not finished. Shall we wait for reaction there to wind this up?[[User:Djflem|Djflem]] ([[User talk:Djflem|talk]]) 16:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] looks ready to do, but the qpq is not yet not finished. Shall we wait for reaction there to wind this up?[[User:Djflem|Djflem]] ([[User talk:Djflem|talk]]) 16:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 
:::: no, - a review is needed, not finishing. I could approve it, but always try to go for improvements. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 17:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 
:::: no, - a review is needed, not finishing. I could approve it, but always try to go for improvements. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 17:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
:::::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] QPQ looks like it's is finishing up. Did a nip and tuck on article. Ready to go.
+
:::::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] QPQ looks like it's is finishing up. Did a nip and tuck on article. Ready to go. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Djflem|Djflem]] ([[User talk:Djflem#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djflem|contribs]]) 17:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)</small>
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:23, 4 February 2018

St. Lubentius, Dietkirchen

St. Lubentius in 2016
St. Lubentius in 2016

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 22:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC).

Symbol possible vote.svg New enough, referenced, hook ref'd, length OK, German language refs accepted IGF, foto no copyrightvio. While the article in generally good, some of the English is awkward, for example: moved probably then from, according to legend, with errant (unintended) German word: bezeugt. On a rock? could this mean "outcropping" (chalk, from one ref) (as appears in photo); collegiate link? Collegiate church. Needs clean-up.Djflem (talk) 13:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for looking, patience please. A few other noms wait for me, was on vacation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Djflem, I reviewed qpq, dropped the word left behind from translation, but will need help for the "probably then" phrase. I read "according to legend" often, linked "outcrop" (thank you for a new word, never heard that), and linked collegiate church three times instead of once. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg looks ready to do, but the qpq is not yet not finished. Shall we wait for reaction there to wind this up?Djflem (talk) 16:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
no, - a review is needed, not finishing. I could approve it, but always try to go for improvements. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Symbol voting keep.svg QPQ looks like it's is finishing up. Did a nip and tuck on article. Ready to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djflem (talkcontribs) 17:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)