Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sticky mat"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)
(re)
imported>Epicgenius
(approved)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
|neutral      = y
 
|neutral      = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother  = The first source should be linked to https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-102/pdfs/2016-102.pdf directly, rather than https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-102/, unless there's a specific reason. But this is optional, although more convenient for the reader.
+
|policyother  = <!--The first source should be linked to https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-102/pdfs/2016-102.pdf directly, rather than https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-102/, unless there's a specific reason. But this is optional, although more convenient for the reader.-->
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookinterest = y
 
|hookinterest = y
Line 37: Line 37:
 
|picclear    = y
 
|picclear    = y
 
|qpq          = y
 
|qpq          = y
|status      = ?
+
|status      = y
 
|comments    =  
 
|comments    =  
 
|sign        =  [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 16:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 
|sign        =  [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 16:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Line 45: Line 45:
 
:::Yeah, you're right about the second point. But for the first one, maybe you can include a link to the PDF anyway (as well as to the landing page)? This helps readers navigate to the citation faster, otherwise you run the risk of a {{tl|failed verification}} just slapped onto the article. Otherwise, everything is good to go. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 18:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 
:::Yeah, you're right about the second point. But for the first one, maybe you can include a link to the PDF anyway (as well as to the landing page)? This helps readers navigate to the citation faster, otherwise you run the risk of a {{tl|failed verification}} just slapped onto the article. Otherwise, everything is good to go. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 18:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 
::::It would be confusing to have two URLs for the same citation.  This is beyond the scope of DYK anyway.  [[User:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)]] ([[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|talk]]) 22:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 
::::It would be confusing to have two URLs for the same citation.  This is beyond the scope of DYK anyway.  [[User:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)]] ([[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|talk]]) 22:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 
+
:::::I disagree on the point that it would be confusing, but I'm not going to press the issue.  That said, everything is good to go for this nom. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 23:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:12, 9 March 2017

Sticky mat

A soiled sticky mat in a nanomaterials production facility
A soiled sticky mat in a nanomaterials production facility

Created by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 22:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

  • Overall, everything looks good so far, apart from the two minor issues (the first is more of a matter of convenience, the other needs to be fixed before this can be approved). epicgenius (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
There's no requirement that the fact can't be in a caption; the rules only state that must be in the article, not specifically in the body. Also, linking to an HTML landing page is preferred over linking to a PDF since it's easier to get metadata from the former. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 17:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, you're right about the second point. But for the first one, maybe you can include a link to the PDF anyway (as well as to the landing page)? This helps readers navigate to the citation faster, otherwise you run the risk of a {{failed verification}} just slapped onto the article. Otherwise, everything is good to go. epicgenius (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
It would be confusing to have two URLs for the same citation. This is beyond the scope of DYK anyway. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
I disagree on the point that it would be confusing, but I'm not going to press the issue. That said, everything is good to go for this nom. epicgenius (talk) 23:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)