Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Summa Grammatica"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>LlywelynII
(new dykn)
 
imported>WilliamThweatt
({{subst:DYKtick}} reviewed...looks good 2 go)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article length and age are fine, multiple spot checks revealed no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used and all the references to sources that are accessible online check out, AGF for the few that aren't. Hooks are all interesting; ALT2 is most interesting (imho) but it is only implied in the article, not stated outright, so I'm passing the main hook, it is referenced and the length is appropriate. Good start to an interesting topic, I can't believe we didn't already have an article for this! <small>On a side note, "too many references" probably isn't a complaint heard much around here, but, in looking at the article as a casual reader (not as an editor), I found all of the notes and refs a bit distracting. Where possible, I would move the mid-sentence refs to the end of the sentence, and maybe even where a certain source is used multiple times in a paragraph, I would consider just noting it at the end of the paragraph. Again, that's probably just a style preference and, FWIW, just my two cents, in no way affecting the DYK nomination.</small> All in all, nice work!--[[User:WilliamThweatt|William Thweatt]] <sup>[[User talk:WilliamThweatt|Talk]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/WilliamThweatt|Contribs]]</sup> 01:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:04, 3 November 2015

Summa Grammatica

Friar Bacon in his study
Friar Bacon in his study

Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 06:42, 22 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article length and age are fine, multiple spot checks revealed no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used and all the references to sources that are accessible online check out, AGF for the few that aren't. Hooks are all interesting; ALT2 is most interesting (imho) but it is only implied in the article, not stated outright, so I'm passing the main hook, it is referenced and the length is appropriate. Good start to an interesting topic, I can't believe we didn't already have an article for this! On a side note, "too many references" probably isn't a complaint heard much around here, but, in looking at the article as a casual reader (not as an editor), I found all of the notes and refs a bit distracting. Where possible, I would move the mid-sentence refs to the end of the sentence, and maybe even where a certain source is used multiple times in a paragraph, I would consider just noting it at the end of the paragraph. Again, that's probably just a style preference and, FWIW, just my two cents, in no way affecting the DYK nomination. All in all, nice work!--William Thweatt TalkContribs 01:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)