Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Susan J. Douglas"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr
imported>PumpkinSky
(prep2)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 10:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Susan J. Douglas====
 
====Susan J. Douglas====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Susan J. Douglas|Susan J. Douglas}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Susan J. Douglas|Susan J. Douglas}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that US academic '''[[Susan J. Douglas]]''' is concerned that depictions of high-powered women in media imply (incorrectly) that [[feminism]] has achieved its goals?
 
{{*mp}}... that US academic '''[[Susan J. Douglas]]''' is concerned that depictions of high-powered women in media imply (incorrectly) that [[feminism]] has achieved its goals?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Sue Gardner|Sue Gardner]] ([[User talk:Sue Gardner|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 22:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Sue Gardner|Sue Gardner]] ([[User talk:Sue Gardner|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 22:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Susan J. Douglas|Casliber}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Susan J. Douglas|Sue Gardner}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*I reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Double-banded Sandgrouse]]....[[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:*I reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Double-banded Sandgrouse]]....[[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 13:
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  New enough.  Long enough.  Fully supported by inline citations.  No plagiarism concerns.  No images requiring a check.  Reads as neutral enough.  Hook is properly formatted.  Yay! QPQ! :D Hook text is supported by : "In it, Douglas examines the evolution of the women in the media - the rise of depictions of power and success giving credence to the idea of feminism having fulfilled its aims, and of sexist old-style depictions of women as sex objects - and how these undermine women's status and equality.". Sourced.  Source supports this.  Hook is interesting enough. :) --05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  New enough.  Long enough.  Fully supported by inline citations.  No plagiarism concerns.  No images requiring a check.  Reads as neutral enough.  Hook is properly formatted.  Yay! QPQ! :D Hook text is supported by : "In it, Douglas examines the evolution of the women in the media - the rise of depictions of power and success giving credence to the idea of feminism having fulfilled its aims, and of sexist old-style depictions of women as sex objects - and how these undermine women's status and equality.". Sourced.  Source supports this.  Hook is interesting enough. :) --05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
  
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
+
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 10:10, 7 June 2012

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 10:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Susan J. Douglas

  • ... that US academic Susan J. Douglas is concerned that depictions of high-powered women in media imply (incorrectly) that feminism has achieved its goals?

Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Sue Gardner (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 22:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg New enough. Long enough. Fully supported by inline citations. No plagiarism concerns. No images requiring a check. Reads as neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. Yay! QPQ! :D Hook text is supported by : "In it, Douglas examines the evolution of the women in the media - the rise of depictions of power and success giving credence to the idea of feminism having fulfilled its aims, and of sexist old-style depictions of women as sex objects - and how these undermine women's status and equality.". Sourced. Source supports this. Hook is interesting enough. :) --05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)