Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Tamarack Swamp"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Matty.007 (Good) |
imported>Matty.007 (Remove potential OWN language) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] In all, please do another QPQ. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #F00;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #010132;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #039685">007</span>]] 20:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | ::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] In all, please do another QPQ. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #F00;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #010132;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #039685">007</span>]] 20:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
*{{done}}, [[Template:Did you know nominations/James Machon (skier)]]. --[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) 20:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | *{{done}}, [[Template:Did you know nominations/James Machon (skier)]]. --[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) 20:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | **[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you very much for reviewing my | + | **[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you very much for reviewing my nom in time. Good to go! Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #F00;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #010132;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #039685">007</span>]] 08:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 08:22, 18 February 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tamarack Swamp
- ... that Tamarack Swamp is home to the only species of deciduous conifer in Pennsylvania?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 20:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC).
- The following has been checked in this review by Matty.007
- I would quite like a new QPQ, given that the given one only has a line of rejection, instead of all addressed matters. I wouldn't mind if it had been failed because of your statement, but you were immediately countered by Orlady
- Article mainspaced by Jakec on 15 February 2014, and has 3774 characters of readable prose
- Every paragraph is sourced
- Dup det found no copyvios in the source I spotchecked, and another I looked at was not a copyvio
- Article is neutral
- Hook is interesting and well sourced; though similar to the source, I think there isn't really another way of phrasing it (although if there is, please change it)
In all, please do another QPQ. Thanks, Matty.007 20:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)