Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Target House, London"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>KAVEBEAR |
imported>Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 (Re) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | * ... that ''[[The Times]]'' of London thought that the towers on '''[[Target House, London|Target House]]''' ''(pictured)'' made the observer say "ouch"? | + | * <s>... that ''[[The Times]]'' of London thought that the towers on '''[[Target House, London|Target House]]''' ''(pictured)'' made the observer say "ouch"?</s> |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Dutch letter|Dutch letter]]. | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Dutch letter|Dutch letter]]. | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:::'''ALT1''' ... that ''[[The Times]]'' of London praised the '''[[Target House, London|Target House]]''' for its boldness but said its towers made observers say "ouch"? | :::'''ALT1''' ... that ''[[The Times]]'' of London praised the '''[[Target House, London|Target House]]''' for its boldness but said its towers made observers say "ouch"? | ||
::::I support the alternative hook as well.--[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 03:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC) | ::::I support the alternative hook as well.--[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 03:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::{{replyto|KAVEBEAR}} Feel free to restore the tick if you agree the ALT meets all criteria; I proposed it, so I'm unable to. ~ <b>[[User:BU Rob13|Rob]]</b><sup>[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 03:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 03:49, 8 August 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Target House, London
... that The Times of London thought that the towers on Target House (pictured) made the observer say "ouch"?
- Reviewed: Dutch letter.
Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 13:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC).
Nominated four days after creation so new enough, article long enough. No close paraphrasing or neutrality issue detected. The hook is sourced to reliable source. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:Replyto This hook does not appear to be neutral to me. Focusing only on an aspect of a mixed review that sounds negative places undue weight on it. How about this instead? ~ RobTalk 03:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that The Times of London praised the Target House for its boldness but said its towers made observers say "ouch"?
- I support the alternative hook as well.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Replyto Feel free to restore the tick if you agree the ALT meets all criteria; I proposed it, so I'm unable to. ~ RobTalk 03:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- I support the alternative hook as well.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)