Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Tata Jagriti Yatra"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Orlady
(returning to noms page from prep -- see reasons here)
imported>Crisco 1492
(no)
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]  Article seems excessively advert-like and hook fact is not supported by a citation in the article. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 18:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]  Article seems excessively advert-like and hook fact is not supported by a citation in the article. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 18:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 
+
*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Article untouched in 7 days. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 01:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:12, 15 October 2011

Tata Jagriti Yatra

Created/expanded by BabyPoochies (talk). Self nom at 12:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email
Since the ALT hook was proposed by me, i will wait for someone else to review the hook. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
16px No hook, thus it fails the WP:WIADYK. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Changed my review. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi... Could you please elaborate on the problem in my article? I did not quite get what the issue was.. :( BabyPoochies (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

There is no problem with the article, but you need to put a fact from it so we can put in on the Did you know? section. However I have put one know. So there are no issues now. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much! :) BabyPoochies (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

16px Good to go. Needs someone to review the hook. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • 16px Article seems excessively advert-like and hook fact is not supported by a citation in the article. --Orlady (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • 16px Article untouched in 7 days. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)