Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Termitomyces eurhizus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (Cites added.) |
imported>Alekjds (great, good to go) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough (created on 19 November), long enough (with 1937 characters of readable prose). The article is well cited in inline citations throughout. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Termitomyces+eurhizus&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig] utterly rules out plagiarism. QPQ done. I like both hooks (I would vote for the second), which are both supported by the sources provided above, but {{ping|Casliber}} can't those facts be explicitly cited with inline citations ''within'' the article itself? Currently they are not. (They're practically the only facts not explicitly cited in the article.) Once that's done I'll be happy to approve. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 11:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough (created on 19 November), long enough (with 1937 characters of readable prose). The article is well cited in inline citations throughout. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Termitomyces+eurhizus&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig] utterly rules out plagiarism. QPQ done. I like both hooks (I would vote for the second), which are both supported by the sources provided above, but {{ping|Casliber}} can't those facts be explicitly cited with inline citations ''within'' the article itself? Currently they are not. (They're practically the only facts not explicitly cited in the article.) Once that's done I'll be happy to approve. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 11:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
::*Cites added. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 11:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ::*Cites added. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 11:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Well done, thanks. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 13:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 13:41, 20 November 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Termitomyces eurhizus
- ... that the edible mushroom Termitomyces eurhizus grows out of termite mounds? See here and here
- ALT1:... that the edible fungus Termitomyces eurhizus has a symbiotic relationship with termites? source
Created by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 00:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC).
- 16px New enough (created on 19 November), long enough (with 1937 characters of readable prose). The article is well cited in inline citations throughout. Earwig utterly rules out plagiarism. QPQ done. I like both hooks (I would vote for the second), which are both supported by the sources provided above, but Template:Ping can't those facts be explicitly cited with inline citations within the article itself? Currently they are not. (They're practically the only facts not explicitly cited in the article.) Once that's done I'll be happy to approve. — AJDS talk 11:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
