Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Martian (film)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>LlywelynII (note) |
imported>LlywelynII (note) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that '''''[[The Martian (film)|The Martian]]''''' became | + | * ... <s>that '''''[[The Martian (film)|The Martian]]''''' became [[Ridley Scott]]'s ''(pictured)'' highest-grossing film?</s> |
| − | :* '''ALT1''':... that [[NASA]] helped '''''[[The Martian (film)|The Martian]]''''' more than most other films in | + | :* '''ALT1''':... that [[NASA]] helped '''''[[The Martian (film)|The Martian]]''''' more than most other films in its development? |
| − | :* ''Reviewed'': <s>Soon.</s> [[Template:Did you know nominations/Proposals for concerted operation among the powers at war with the piratical States of Barbary|Proposals for concerted operation among the powers at war with the piratical States of Barbary]] | + | :* ''Reviewed'': <s>Soon.</s> <s>[[Template:Did you know nominations/Proposals for concerted operation among the powers at war with the piratical States of Barbary|Proposals for concerted operation among the powers at war with the piratical States of Barbary]]</s> |
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Captain Assassin!|Captain Assassin!]] ([[User talk:Captain Assassin!|talk]]). Self-nominated at 12:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Captain Assassin!|Captain Assassin!]] ([[User talk:Captain Assassin!|talk]]). Self-nominated at 12:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<!-- Automated review by User:DYKReviewBot --> | <!-- Automated review by User:DYKReviewBot --> | ||
*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] '''Some issues found.''' | *[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] '''Some issues found.''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
**<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">✗</span> Paragraphs [2] (After ... news.),[3] (After ... lives.) in this article lack a citation. | **<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">✗</span> Paragraphs [2] (After ... news.),[3] (After ... lives.) in this article lack a citation. | ||
| − | |||
**<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">✗</span> There is possible close paraphrasing on this article with 39.0% confidence. ([https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=The+Martian+%28film%29&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1 confirm]) | **<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">✗</span> There is possible close paraphrasing on this article with 39.0% confidence. ([https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=The+Martian+%28film%29&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1 confirm]) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
**<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">✗</span> [[User:Captain Assassin!|Captain Assassin!]] has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination. | **<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">✗</span> [[User:Captain Assassin!|Captain Assassin!]] has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination. | ||
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This bot is experimental; please [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DYKReviewBot|report any issues]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 22:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This bot is experimental; please [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DYKReviewBot|report any issues]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 22:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| Line 41: | Line 33: | ||
:* On it. — [[User talk:LlywelynII|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Llywelyn<font color="Gold">II</font></span>]] 18:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | :* On it. — [[User talk:LlywelynII|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Llywelyn<font color="Gold">II</font></span>]] 18:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Martian_(film)&oldid=727485179 Timely]; certainly long enough, well-cited, and within policy; GAs which happen to have paragraphs which happen to lack citations are just proof that rule of thumb should never be used as an ironclad rule, not evidence that the article needs tweaking or rewriting; hook had grammar issue (fixt); hook rather boring but (more importantly) unsupported in the article (it's claimed in the lead without citation; the citation in the running text merely notes it was his highest ''domestic'' box office as of 2015); the pic is irrelevant to ALT1; ALT1 is pretty banal: it helps a space movie more than most movies, sure. It'd be nice if there were a better hook to work with, but (fwiw) it is supported. (Cleaned up grammar, though.)<br><br>The bigger issue is that, no, the QPQ is '''not''' done. Whatever {{sc|wp:agf}} could be offered to such a lazy review is undone by the fact that the ''hook'' the editor approved mentioned the wrong countries and that the hook has nothing to do with the subject of the article being promoted. Certainly appreciate the good work and congratulations on the GA... just, y'know, go do another one and, y'know, this time take the time to actually do it. — [[User talk:LlywelynII|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Llywelyn<font color="Gold">II</font></span>]] 19:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 24 July 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Martian (film)
- ...
that The Martian became Ridley Scott's (pictured) highest-grossing film?
- ALT1:... that NASA helped The Martian more than most other films in its development?
- Reviewed:
Soon.Proposals for concerted operation among the powers at war with the piratical States of Barbary
Improved to Good Article status by Captain Assassin! (talk). Self-nominated at 12:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC).
Some issues found.
- ✗ Paragraphs [2] (After ... news.),[3] (After ... lives.) in this article lack a citation.
- ✗ There is possible close paraphrasing on this article with 39.0% confidence. (confirm)
- ✗ Captain Assassin! has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- QPQ is done. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 08:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Submitted QPQ of "looks all good to me" is not acceptable. QPQ reviews must be complete and specify everything the reviewer checked. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- On it. — LlywelynII 18:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Timely; certainly long enough, well-cited, and within policy; GAs which happen to have paragraphs which happen to lack citations are just proof that rule of thumb should never be used as an ironclad rule, not evidence that the article needs tweaking or rewriting; hook had grammar issue (fixt); hook rather boring but (more importantly) unsupported in the article (it's claimed in the lead without citation; the citation in the running text merely notes it was his highest domestic box office as of 2015); the pic is irrelevant to ALT1; ALT1 is pretty banal: it helps a space movie more than most movies, sure. It'd be nice if there were a better hook to work with, but (fwiw) it is supported. (Cleaned up grammar, though.)
The bigger issue is that, no, the QPQ is not done. Whatever Template:Sc could be offered to such a lazy review is undone by the fact that the hook the editor approved mentioned the wrong countries and that the hook has nothing to do with the subject of the article being promoted. Certainly appreciate the good work and congratulations on the GA... just, y'know, go do another one and, y'know, this time take the time to actually do it. — LlywelynII 19:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
