Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thine Antique Pen (nom) |
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:*<!--Make first comment here--> | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | ||
| + | * [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough. I think people will read the article as DYK padding because of the length of the lead (which does indeed appear to be written in summary style and contain only facts from the body.) but 300 characters over. | ||
| + | * [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article only has three sources. Hook is cited to what appears to be a book site. This strikes me as a possible [[WP:RS]] problem. Can additional sources or more [[WP:RS]] sources be used for the hooked fact? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ done. No images to check. Neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. No plagiarism concerns. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Sources needed. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 00:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 00:45, 27 June 2012
The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown
- ... that the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Georgetown is a former historic industrial building?
- ALT1:... that the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Georgetown is known to be good for privacy?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/MathStar
Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 18:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. I think people will read the article as DYK padding because of the length of the lead (which does indeed appear to be written in summary style and contain only facts from the body.) but 300 characters over.
Article only has three sources. Hook is cited to what appears to be a book site. This strikes me as a possible WP:RS problem. Can additional sources or more WP:RS sources be used for the hooked fact?
Sources needed. --LauraHale (talk) 00:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)