Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Reardon"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Astro interest
imported>Harrias
(pedantic, you're having a laugh?)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
:::I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
:::I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 07:16, 29 January 2015

Thomas Reardon

Created by Astro interest (talk). Self nominated at 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook directly cited to RS. No QPQ required here. Good to go. --Jakob (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Symbol possible vote.svg I have pulled the hook from the prep area because of inaccuracy of the hook. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Browser wars. -Zanhe (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Revised per concerns at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Browser_wars. Astro interest (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --Jakob (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Symbol possible vote.svg Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. Harrias talk 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. Astro interest (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. Harrias talk 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)