Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Reardon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Astro interest |
imported>Harrias (pedantic, you're having a laugh?) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ::[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 07:16, 29 January 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Thomas Reardon
- ... that Thomas Reardon invented Internet Explorer?
Created by Astro interest (talk). Self nominated at 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC).
I have pulled the hook from the prep area because of inaccuracy of the hook. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Browser wars. -Zanhe (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT: ... that Thomas Reardon was for a time Microsoft's entire Internet Explorer development team?
Revised per concerns at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Browser_wars. Astro interest (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --Jakob (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. Harrias talk 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. Astro interest (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. Harrias talk 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. Astro interest (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)