Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Throffer"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492
(re)
imported>J Milburn
(Reply)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Checking my opinion of the word itself at the door. Everything looks DYK-able, including an interesting hook, well referenced and new article, quality sources, good grammar, etc. AGF on offline sources. My only suggestion to you is to fix the footnote links, as several of them don't go to the book.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)<!--Make first comment here-->
 
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Checking my opinion of the word itself at the door. Everything looks DYK-able, including an interesting hook, well referenced and new article, quality sources, good grammar, etc. AGF on offline sources. My only suggestion to you is to fix the footnote links, as several of them don't go to the book.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)<!--Make first comment here-->
 
+
::*Thanks for the review. I've played with the footnote links a bit. There's still one that's problematic, and I've asked for help [[Template_talk:Sfn#Can_I_have_a_little_help.3F|here]]. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 17:31, 23 February 2013

Throffer

  • ... that in The Godfather, the "offer" that cannot be refused is not an offer at all, but is instead a throffer?
  • Comment: Interesting concept from political philosophy with a provocative hook.

Created by J Milburn (talk). Self nominated at 01:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC).

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Checking my opinion of the word itself at the door. Everything looks DYK-able, including an interesting hook, well referenced and new article, quality sources, good grammar, etc. AGF on offline sources. My only suggestion to you is to fix the footnote links, as several of them don't go to the book. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I've played with the footnote links a bit. There's still one that's problematic, and I've asked for help here. J Milburn (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)