Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Tubutulik River"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hawkeye7 (Passed - Moved to Prep Area 1) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Tubutulik River==== | ====Tubutulik River==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Tubutulik River|Tubutulik River}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Tubutulik River|Tubutulik River}} | ||
| − | + | *... that areas along the '''[[Tubutulik River]]''' contain abnormal [[radioactivity]]? | |
| − | : | + | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/List of conservation areas in Crawley; Dyers Almshouses]] |
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]), [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]), [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) at 04:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]), [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]), [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) at 04:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
Revision as of 00:39, 8 March 2018
The following is an archived discussion of Tubutulik River's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tubutulik River
- ... that areas along the Tubutulik River contain abnormal radioactivity?
5x expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 04:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC).
5x expansion and hook sourcing verified. However, I'm not sure whether it's a simple copy and paste error or a sign of a more serious problem, but the "Watershed management" section has both some ungrammatical text and some text that appears to have been copied directly from its source. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
-
Ok. I think the "Geography" section could still use a more thoughtful organization (e.g. it talks about where the river rises both in the first paragraph and then in more vague terms in the third) but I think all the issues that could block DYK are taken care of; I didn't find any more copied text. I made some minor grammatical fixes in the "Wildlife" section, but nothing that would affect the actual content. Good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)