Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Uppsala House"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Victuallers
(city)
imported>Yoninah
(good to go)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the city of [[Uppsala]] in [[Sweden]] helped <s>pay</s> to renovate '''[[Uppsala House]]''' ''(pictured)'' in [[Estonia]]?
+
* ... that the city of [[Uppsala]] in [[Sweden]] helped renovate the '''[[Uppsala House]]''' ''(pictured)'' in [[Estonia]]?
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->
Line 28: Line 28:
 
**Just to be clear, it was the municipality of Uppsala that signed the deal, not the people in an abstract sense. ALT hook needed. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 04:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 
**Just to be clear, it was the municipality of Uppsala that signed the deal, not the people in an abstract sense. ALT hook needed. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 04:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 
***Thanks Sonan, I have changed "people" to "city" in the hook to address your issue. Alt hooks are welcome [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 08:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 
***Thanks Sonan, I have changed "people" to "city" in the hook to address your issue. Alt hooks are welcome [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 08:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook is interesting, verified, and cited inline. QPQ done. Good to go. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:42, 28 January 2014

Uppsala House

Uppsala House

Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nominated at 12:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New; length and citations good. However, article says only "agreed a joint programme to cooperate in the 'Restoration of Old Buildings' initiative", with no mention of payment; the source likewise. [New reviewer; second opinions welcome] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I've removed the payment from the hook. I think its very unlikely that Uppsala did this using 100% Estonian money but I guess we need to be precise. Victuallers (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Reviewer needed to finish this review, including areas required for DYK but not covered in initial checks such as neutrality and close paraphrasing. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
    • Just to be clear, it was the municipality of Uppsala that signed the deal, not the people in an abstract sense. ALT hook needed. --Soman (talk) 04:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
      • Thanks Sonan, I have changed "people" to "city" in the hook to address your issue. Alt hooks are welcome Victuallers (talk) 08:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article is new enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook is interesting, verified, and cited inline. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)