Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/V. S. Lelchuk"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Amakuru (re) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|V. S. Lelchuk}} | {{DYK header|V. S. Lelchuk}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=V. S. Lelchuk|V. S. Lelchuk}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=V. S. Lelchuk|V. S. Lelchuk}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[V. S. Lelchuk|Vitaliĭ Lelʹchuk]]''' edited 13 arguments between historians? | * ... that '''[[V. S. Lelchuk|Vitaliĭ Lelʹchuk]]''' edited 13 arguments between historians? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Pierre Mambele|Pierre Mambele]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Pierre Mambele|Pierre Mambele]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) and [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) at 21:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) and [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) at 21:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{DYK checklist | {{DYK checklist | ||
| Line 41: | Line 32: | ||
|status = ? | |status = ? | ||
|comments = Overall a good and interesting article and thanks to the authors for bringing it to our attention. It's possible a mutual friend of ours, who's fond of spotting errors, might object to the lack of citations in the "Selected publications" section, but I think the consensus has prevailed several times in the past that the books themselves are sufficient for such a section, even where the selection criteria is not obvious. So I won't fail it on that ground. Just need to clarify the image statuses, then it's good to go. I assume this hook is intended for the "quirky" column, as it's slightly confusingly stated, but sounds kind of funny so acceptable. Thanks! | |comments = Overall a good and interesting article and thanks to the authors for bringing it to our attention. It's possible a mutual friend of ours, who's fond of spotting errors, might object to the lack of citations in the "Selected publications" section, but I think the consensus has prevailed several times in the past that the books themselves are sufficient for such a section, even where the selection criteria is not obvious. So I won't fail it on that ground. Just need to clarify the image statuses, then it's good to go. I assume this hook is intended for the "quirky" column, as it's slightly confusingly stated, but sounds kind of funny so acceptable. Thanks! | ||
| − | |sign = — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 20:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC) | + | |sign = — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 20:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC) |
}} | }} | ||
:Thanks. I didn't have lots of hook options but historians fighting sounded sort of amusing as you say. I am [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Referencing lists of publications|endeavouring to reinforce that consensus]] as it keeps coming up. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 20:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC) | :Thanks. I didn't have lots of hook options but historians fighting sounded sort of amusing as you say. I am [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Referencing lists of publications|endeavouring to reinforce that consensus]] as it keeps coming up. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 20:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| Line 50: | Line 41: | ||
::The Russians aren't known for their quirkiness, that's why they lost the Cold War, an endemic shortage of quirks. Whenever they did produce any, a huge queue would form and they would quickly sell out. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 23:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC) | ::The Russians aren't known for their quirkiness, that's why they lost the Cold War, an endemic shortage of quirks. Whenever they did produce any, a huge queue would form and they would quickly sell out. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 23:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Thank you! {{ping|Amakuru}} would you mind reviewing ALT1? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC) | :::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Thank you! {{ping|Amakuru}} would you mind reviewing ALT1? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::*:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - {{ping|Yoninah}} {{ping|Philafrenzy}} apologies, I saw this ping at the time and then forgot to come back to it. ALT1 looks fine to me, although I've tweaked "an historical" to "a historical" because that's the far more common usage, and I've rarely seen the other on Wikipedia. To be honest I was fine with ALT0 too, but this is fine. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 22:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC) | + | :::*:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - {{ping|Yoninah}} {{ping|Philafrenzy}} apologies, I saw this ping at the time and then forgot to come back to it. ALT1 looks fine to me, although I've tweaked "an historical" to "a historical" because that's the far more common usage, and I've rarely seen the other on Wikipedia. To be honest I was fine with ALT0 too, but this is fine. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 22:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 06:27, 6 February 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
V. S. Lelchuk
- ... that Vitaliĭ Lelʹchuk edited 13 arguments between historians?
- Reviewed: Pierre Mambele
Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 21:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC).
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thanks. I didn't have lots of hook options but historians fighting sounded sort of amusing as you say. I am endeavouring to reinforce that consensus as it keeps coming up. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- passing the nom, based on the discussion above. If the community feels the image is problematic, then we'll just remove it. All else is good. — Amakuru (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't find it hooky, much less quirky. The article doesn't even talk about "arguments", but "conversations". Can't you, the master of quirky hooks, Template:U, come up with something better? Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- "The same year, he edited Istoriki sporjat: Trinadcat' besed (Historians argue: Thirteen conversations)." But I will see what I can do... Philafrenzy (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- ALT1:... that Vitaliĭ Lelʹchuk joined with dissident and revisionist historians in a "historical glasnost" during the collapse of the Soviet Union? Philafrenzy (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- The Russians aren't known for their quirkiness, that's why they lost the Cold War, an endemic shortage of quirks. Whenever they did produce any, a huge queue would form and they would quickly sell out. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! Template:Ping would you mind reviewing ALT1? Yoninah (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Template:Ping apologies, I saw this ping at the time and then forgot to come back to it. ALT1 looks fine to me, although I've tweaked "an historical" to "a historical" because that's the far more common usage, and I've rarely seen the other on Wikipedia. To be honest I was fine with ALT0 too, but this is fine. — Amakuru (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- The Russians aren't known for their quirkiness, that's why they lost the Cold War, an endemic shortage of quirks. Whenever they did produce any, a huge queue would form and they would quickly sell out. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)