Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vénus de Quinipily"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maile66 (hook needs a rewrite) |
imported>Vivvt (re) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:* I've done [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A9nus_de_Quinipily&diff=607597576&oldid=607172434 some copy-editing] on the article. The hook seems reasonable, but I haven't checked any sources. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme|talk]]) 08:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | :* I've done [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A9nus_de_Quinipily&diff=607597576&oldid=607172434 some copy-editing] on the article. The hook seems reasonable, but I haven't checked any sources. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme|talk]]) 08:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook needs to be reworded. While the article says {{tq|It is said that "foul", "indecent and obscene" rites were also practiced at the statue, and that many couples performed "erotic" acts near the statue.}} It doesn't actually say when these things happened, and that was only one of several different stories associated with its history. In a different section below that, it states {{tq|As the statue became an object of a pagan veneration, Charles de Rosmadec — Bishop of Vannes and missionaries requested Claude de Lannion — Lord of Blavet Quinipily, to destroy the statue. In 1661, Lannion ordered the statue to be thrown into the Blavet river.}} and in 1670 Lannion ordered it smashed into pieces, but it was instead thrown into the river again. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 20:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC) | ::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook needs to be reworded. While the article says {{tq|It is said that "foul", "indecent and obscene" rites were also practiced at the statue, and that many couples performed "erotic" acts near the statue.}} It doesn't actually say when these things happened, and that was only one of several different stories associated with its history. In a different section below that, it states {{tq|As the statue became an object of a pagan veneration, Charles de Rosmadec — Bishop of Vannes and missionaries requested Claude de Lannion — Lord of Blavet Quinipily, to destroy the statue. In 1661, Lannion ordered the statue to be thrown into the Blavet river.}} and in 1670 Lannion ordered it smashed into pieces, but it was instead thrown into the river again. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 20:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::'''ALT 1''': ... that during seventeenth century, '''[[Vénus de Quinipily|The Iron Lady]]''' ''(pictured)'' was an object of a pagan veneration and was thrown into river twice as many couples performed erotic acts near the statue? | ||
+ | :::*Changed hook and article to add time. However, I dont get your second point about Lannions. Can you elaborate? - [[User:Vivvt|<span style="font:italic bold 11px Georgia, serif"><font color="#808080">Vivvt</font></span>]] <small style="font-size:85%;">([[User talk:Vivvt|<font color="#000000">Talk</font>]])</small> 15:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:21, 15 May 2014
DYK toolbox |
---|
Vénus de Quinipily
- ... that The Iron Lady (pictured) was an object of a pagan veneration and was thrown into river twice as many couples performed erotic acts near the statue?
- Reviewed: Praxis Pietatis Melica
5x expanded by Vivvt (talk). Self nominated at 16:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC).
- I've done some copy-editing on the article. The hook seems reasonable, but I haven't checked any sources. --Slashme (talk) 08:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The hook needs to be reworded. While the article says Template:Tq It doesn't actually say when these things happened, and that was only one of several different stories associated with its history. In a different section below that, it states Template:Tq and in 1670 Lannion ordered it smashed into pieces, but it was instead thrown into the river again. — Maile (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- ALT 1: ... that during seventeenth century, The Iron Lady (pictured) was an object of a pagan veneration and was thrown into river twice as many couples performed erotic acts near the statue?