Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vénus de Quinipily"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(hook needs a rewrite)
imported>Vivvt
(re)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
:* I've done [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A9nus_de_Quinipily&diff=607597576&oldid=607172434 some copy-editing] on the article.  The hook seems reasonable, but I haven't checked any sources. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme|talk]]) 08:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 
:* I've done [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A9nus_de_Quinipily&diff=607597576&oldid=607172434 some copy-editing] on the article.  The hook seems reasonable, but I haven't checked any sources. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme|talk]]) 08:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 
::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook needs to be reworded.  While the article says {{tq|It is said that "foul", "indecent and obscene" rites were also practiced at the statue, and that many couples performed "erotic" acts near the statue.}} It doesn't actually say when these things happened, and that was only one of several different stories associated with its history.  In a different section below that, it states {{tq|As the statue became an object of a pagan veneration, Charles de Rosmadec — Bishop of Vannes and missionaries requested Claude de Lannion — Lord of Blavet Quinipily, to destroy the statue. In 1661, Lannion ordered the statue to be thrown into the Blavet river.}} and in 1670 Lannion ordered it smashed into pieces, but it was instead thrown into the river again. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 20:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 
::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook needs to be reworded.  While the article says {{tq|It is said that "foul", "indecent and obscene" rites were also practiced at the statue, and that many couples performed "erotic" acts near the statue.}} It doesn't actually say when these things happened, and that was only one of several different stories associated with its history.  In a different section below that, it states {{tq|As the statue became an object of a pagan veneration, Charles de Rosmadec — Bishop of Vannes and missionaries requested Claude de Lannion — Lord of Blavet Quinipily, to destroy the statue. In 1661, Lannion ordered the statue to be thrown into the Blavet river.}} and in 1670 Lannion ordered it smashed into pieces, but it was instead thrown into the river again. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 20:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 +
:::'''ALT 1''': ... that during seventeenth century, '''[[Vénus de Quinipily|The Iron Lady]]''' ''(pictured)'' was an object of a pagan veneration and was thrown into river twice as many couples performed erotic acts near the statue?
 +
:::*Changed hook and article to add time. However, I dont get your second point about Lannions. Can you elaborate? - [[User:Vivvt|<span style="font:italic bold 11px Georgia, serif"><font color="#808080">Vivvt</font></span>]] <small style="font-size:85%;">([[User talk:Vivvt|<font color="#000000">Talk</font>]])</small> 15:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:21, 15 May 2014

Vénus de Quinipily

Venus de Quinipily

  • ... that The Iron Lady (pictured) was an object of a pagan veneration and was thrown into river twice as many couples performed erotic acts near the statue?

5x expanded by Vivvt (talk). Self nominated at 16:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC).

  • I've done some copy-editing on the article. The hook seems reasonable, but I haven't checked any sources. --Slashme (talk) 08:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg The hook needs to be reworded. While the article says Template:Tq It doesn't actually say when these things happened, and that was only one of several different stories associated with its history. In a different section below that, it states Template:Tq and in 1670 Lannion ordered it smashed into pieces, but it was instead thrown into the river again. — Maile (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
ALT 1: ... that during seventeenth century, The Iron Lady (pictured) was an object of a pagan veneration and was thrown into river twice as many couples performed erotic acts near the statue?
  • Changed hook and article to add time. However, I dont get your second point about Lannions. Can you elaborate? - Vivvt (Talk) 15:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC)