Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/WXTV (Ohio)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (restoring tick) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 1) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 12:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|WXTV (Ohio)}} | {{DYK header|WXTV (Ohio)}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=WXTV (Ohio)|WXTV (Ohio)}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=WXTV (Ohio)|WXTV (Ohio)}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[WXTV (Ohio)|WXTV]]''' in [[Youngstown, Ohio]], had "technical difficulties" and left the air for good just days after hearings were set to revoke its permit to operate? <small>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HzBAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-1gMAAAAIBAJ&pg=6358%2C5216 Source]</small> | * ... that '''[[WXTV (Ohio)|WXTV]]''' in [[Youngstown, Ohio]], had "technical difficulties" and left the air for good just days after hearings were set to revoke its permit to operate? <small>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HzBAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-1gMAAAAIBAJ&pg=6358%2C5216 Source]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':'' (Combo hook with {{dykn|WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio)}})'' ... that the sale of [[WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio)|WWIZ]] radio in [[Lorain, Ohio]], undertaken in order to raise capital needed to build '''[[WXTV (Ohio)|WXTV]]''' in [[Youngstown, Ohio|Youngstown]], prompted both stations to lose their [[Broadcast license|licenses]]? <small>[https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1963/1963-01-28-BC.pdf Source (pages 58/60)]</small> | ** '''ALT1''':'' (Combo hook with {{dykn|WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio)}})'' ... that the sale of [[WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio)|WWIZ]] radio in [[Lorain, Ohio]], undertaken in order to raise capital needed to build '''[[WXTV (Ohio)|WXTV]]''' in [[Youngstown, Ohio|Youngstown]], prompted both stations to lose their [[Broadcast license|licenses]]? <small>[https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1963/1963-01-28-BC.pdf Source (pages 58/60)]</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Stribodh|Stribodh]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Stribodh|Stribodh]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* Well, this is a unique situation (as I said in the WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio) nomination page). I've never reviewed a nomination where there is both an individual and a combo hook, but for the sake of consistency, I will review the other one as well. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 21:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | :* Well, this is a unique situation (as I said in the WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio) nomination page). I've never reviewed a nomination where there is both an individual and a combo hook, but for the sake of consistency, I will review the other one as well. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 21:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Line 46: | Line 38: | ||
::*{{re|Raymie}} Theoretically, WWIZ can still be run as a new article if enough of the preexisting content were taken out, with about 400 bytes of prose that remain from the preexisting version. I don't know if you would like though. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 23:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC) | ::*{{re|Raymie}} Theoretically, WWIZ can still be run as a new article if enough of the preexisting content were taken out, with about 400 bytes of prose that remain from the preexisting version. I don't know if you would like though. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 23:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::*{{ping|Yoninah|Epicgenius}} Probably a bit of a headache to do that. I've mentioned briefly that the same hearing action resulted in a denial of WWIZ's license renewal as well, so we should be good to go on your concern, Yoninah. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 04:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC) | :::*{{ping|Yoninah|Epicgenius}} Probably a bit of a headache to do that. I've mentioned briefly that the same hearing action resulted in a denial of WWIZ's license renewal as well, so we should be good to go on your concern, Yoninah. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 04:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you. Restoring tick per Epicgenius' review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 12:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC) | + | ::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you. Restoring tick per Epicgenius' review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 12:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:54, 23 December 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
WXTV (Ohio)
- ... that WXTV in Youngstown, Ohio, had "technical difficulties" and left the air for good just days after hearings were set to revoke its permit to operate? Source
- ALT1: (Combo hook with WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio)) ... that the sale of WWIZ radio in Lorain, Ohio, undertaken in order to raise capital needed to build WXTV in Youngstown, prompted both stations to lose their licenses? Source (pages 58/60)
- Reviewed: Stribodh
Created by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 18:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC).
- Well, this is a unique situation (as I said in the WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio) nomination page). I've never reviewed a nomination where there is both an individual and a combo hook, but for the sake of consistency, I will review the other one as well. epicgenius (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
WXTV (Ohio) Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio): per Template:Did you know nominations/WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio), 16px good to go as well. epicgenius (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- 16px Template:Ping I've removed WWIZ from this nomination per discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/WWIZ (Lorain, Ohio). If we're going with ALT1, is the fact that both stations lost their license included in the WXTV article? Yoninah (talk) 23:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re Theoretically, WWIZ can still be run as a new article if enough of the preexisting content were taken out, with about 400 bytes of prose that remain from the preexisting version. I don't know if you would like though. epicgenius (talk) 23:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Probably a bit of a headache to do that. I've mentioned briefly that the same hearing action resulted in a denial of WWIZ's license renewal as well, so we should be good to go on your concern, Yoninah. Raymie (t • c) 04:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
