Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Waldorf Astoria New York"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>West Virginian
m (GTG!)
imported>Miyagawa
(Moved to prep 5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from January 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=January 2015
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 12:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Waldorf Astoria New York====
 
====Waldorf Astoria New York====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
[[File:St Bartholomews and The Waldorf Astoria Hotel.jpg|100x100px|The Waldorf Astoria New York]]
 
[[File:St Bartholomews and The Waldorf Astoria Hotel.jpg|100x100px|The Waldorf Astoria New York]]
</div><!-- 
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that at $1.95 billion, the '''[[Waldorf Astoria New York]]''' is the most expensive hotel ever sold?
 
* ... that at $1.95 billion, the '''[[Waldorf Astoria New York]]''' is the most expensive hotel ever sold?
 
* Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Clancy's|Clancy's]] [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 15:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
* Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Clancy's|Clancy's]] [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 15:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
* Reviewed [[Mary Birdsall House]] [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]) 14:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
* Reviewed [[Mary Birdsall House]] [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]) 14:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
<!-- :* ''Comment'': (QPQ in progress) -->
 
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]), [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) at 21:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]), [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) at 21:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Waldorf Astoria New York|Dr. Blofeld}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Waldorf Astoria New York|We hope}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Waldorf Astoria New York|Epicgenius}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* {{ping|Dr. Blofeld}} I have corrected the typo in your proposed hook. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:* {{ping|Dr. Blofeld}} I have corrected the typo in your proposed hook. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 18:
 
:::{{reply to|Dr. Blofeld}} Thanks for letting me know. I have also credited {{u|We hope}}. [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 13:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:::{{reply to|Dr. Blofeld}} Thanks for letting me know. I have also credited {{u|We hope}}. [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 13:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article was improved to Good Article status recently enough, and utilizes verifiable sources, including for the content of this hook. The image is free, the hook is of an appropriate length, and two QPQ reviews have been completed by its authors. -- [[User:Caponer|Caponer]] ([[User talk:Caponer|talk]]) 17:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article was improved to Good Article status recently enough, and utilizes verifiable sources, including for the content of this hook. The image is free, the hook is of an appropriate length, and two QPQ reviews have been completed by its authors. -- [[User:Caponer|Caponer]] ([[User talk:Caponer|talk]]) 17:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 12:34, 24 January 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 12:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Waldorf Astoria New York

The Waldorf Astoria New York

Improved to Good Article status by Dr. Blofeld (talk), We hope (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 21:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC).

Epi nommed it. Template:U I think you should credit Template:U as well on this one!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Template:Reply to Thanks for letting me know. I have also credited Template:U. Epicgenius (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg This article was improved to Good Article status recently enough, and utilizes verifiable sources, including for the content of this hook. The image is free, the hook is of an appropriate length, and two QPQ reviews have been completed by its authors. -- Caponer (talk) 17:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)