Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wang Guanzhong"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Allen3
(to prep4)
imported>KolbertBot
m (Bot: HTTP→HTTPS (v477))
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Hook is uninteresting and has neutrality concerns. <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 07:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Hook is uninteresting and has neutrality concerns. <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 07:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
::* {{re|Sovereign Sentinel}} Could you elaborate on the "neutrality concerns?" The hook presents the positions of both sides in a balanced manner, and is basically a paraphrase of the lead of [http://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-general-abe-hagel-speeches-provocative-toward-china-1401590684 this WSJ article]. How is it non-neutral? As for interestingness, this trade of barbs was interesting enough to make headlines worldwide last year, just search Google news. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 19:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
+
::* {{re|Sovereign Sentinel}} Could you elaborate on the "neutrality concerns?" The hook presents the positions of both sides in a balanced manner, and is basically a paraphrase of the lead of [https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-general-abe-hagel-speeches-provocative-toward-china-1401590684 this WSJ article]. How is it non-neutral? As for interestingness, this trade of barbs was interesting enough to make headlines worldwide last year, just search Google news. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 19:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sorry, I got mixed up while reviewing... Otherwise the article is long enough, new enough, and adequately sourced. Apologies for the inconvenience <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 23:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sorry, I got mixed up while reviewing... Otherwise the article is long enough, new enough, and adequately sourced. Apologies for the inconvenience <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 23:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 05:04, 3 December 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Wang Guanzhong

Created by Zanhe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Template:Re Could you elaborate on the "neutrality concerns?" The hook presents the positions of both sides in a balanced manner, and is basically a paraphrase of the lead of this WSJ article. How is it non-neutral? As for interestingness, this trade of barbs was interesting enough to make headlines worldwide last year, just search Google news. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Sorry, I got mixed up while reviewing... Otherwise the article is long enough, new enough, and adequately sourced. Apologies for the inconvenience sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 23:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)