Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wasp Branch"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jakec (explaining) |
imported>EEng (gtg again) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:::As the reviewer, I have to say I agree about the clunkiness and non-interstingness, but the fact is we gave up on hooks being "interesting" long ago. I would welcome a new effort to start enforcing that, and even have ideas for how that would work procedurally. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | :::As the reviewer, I have to say I agree about the clunkiness and non-interstingness, but the fact is we gave up on hooks being "interesting" long ago. I would welcome a new effort to start enforcing that, and even have ideas for how that would work procedurally. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::{{ping|Harrias|EEng}} Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery, and all those others are official designations, not descriptions, hence the capitalization. [http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter93/s93.9.html This] explains the difference between designated and existing uses. If the hook is too long, '''ALT1: ''' ... that '''[[Wasp Branch]]''' is designated as a Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery and Class A Wild Trout Waters? --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 16:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::{{ping|Harrias|EEng}} Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery, and all those others are official designations, not descriptions, hence the capitalization. [http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter93/s93.9.html This] explains the difference between designated and existing uses. If the hook is too long, '''ALT1: ''' ... that '''[[Wasp Branch]]''' is designated as a Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery and Class A Wild Trout Waters? --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 16:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] GTG for ALT1 as well. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 02:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 02:13, 17 January 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Wasp Branch
- ... that Wasp Branch is designated as a Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery and Class A Wild Trout Waters and is used as a High-Quality Coldwater Fishery and a Migratory Fishery?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 21:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC).
-
- A 1973 survey discovered no members of the Pteronarcyidae species Pteronarcys biloba on Wasp Branch.
- If these were wasps, I'd understand. But they're not. EEng (talk) 03:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
I've pulled this from the prep area. There is no major issue, but I wanted to make sure there was time for discussion, rather than things been done against a clock. The hook confuses me slightly: I found the repetition of "Coldwater Fishery" and "Migratory Fishery" clunky, especially given the capital letters. I read the article, and then the PA DEP documents, and I can't work out what the difference between a designation and the existing use is? Is there a relevance to the repetition, or is this just bureaucracy? Either way, I don't find the hook at all interesting: a river is used for fishing, and has official designations relevant to that. Shock. Harrias talk 21:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- As the reviewer, I have to say I agree about the clunkiness and non-interstingness, but the fact is we gave up on hooks being "interesting" long ago. I would welcome a new effort to start enforcing that, and even have ideas for how that would work procedurally. EEng (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery, and all those others are official designations, not descriptions, hence the capitalization. This explains the difference between designated and existing uses. If the hook is too long, ALT1: ... that Wasp Branch is designated as a Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery and Class A Wild Trout Waters? --Jakob (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- As the reviewer, I have to say I agree about the clunkiness and non-interstingness, but the fact is we gave up on hooks being "interesting" long ago. I would welcome a new effort to start enforcing that, and even have ideas for how that would work procedurally. EEng (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)