Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wilhelm Holmqvist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Zanhe (image) |
imported>Zanhe m (ce) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. QPQ is done. Image is freely licensed. No copyvio found. | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. QPQ is done. Image is freely licensed. No copyvio found. However, the hook seems inaccurate. As the article and the source say that the archaeological site is prehistoric, not that the statue is. As India is an ancient civilization, the statue may well be historical. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 05:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--><!-- | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--><!-- | ||
--> | --> |
Revision as of 05:54, 2 May 2018
DYK toolbox |
---|
Wilhelm Holmqvist
- ... that Wilhelm Holmqvist discovered a prehistoric North Indian Buddha statuette (pictured) on the Swedish island Helgö? Source: Werner 1990: Google translate (original in German). Lundström & Lamm 1990 for it being North Indian: Google translate (original in Swedish).
- Reviewed: Wayne Entwistle
Created by Usernameunique (talk). Self-nominated at 07:43, 1 May 2018 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. QPQ is done. Image is freely licensed. No copyvio found. However, the hook seems inaccurate. As the article and the source say that the archaeological site is prehistoric, not that the statue is. As India is an ancient civilization, the statue may well be historical. -Zanhe (talk) 05:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)