Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/William Browne (died 1514)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SL93
(tag for re-review)
imported>Daemonic Kangaroo
(Good to go)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
:::Thanks for catching that. I've fixed it. And thanks to both you and BabbaQ for the reviews. [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 17:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:::Thanks for catching that. I've fixed it. And thanks to both you and BabbaQ for the reviews. [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 17:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  The nomination needs a re-review based on the new issue. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 17:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  The nomination needs a re-review based on the new issue. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 17:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 +
;*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Although I'm not convinced that my pointing out an error in the article created the need for a second review, I have now done this and made some minor edits to tidy up the referencing. I am happy to concur with the previous reviewer, that the article meets all the DYK criteria: the article was new when proposed, it is long enough, neutral, properly referenced with no close paraphrasing issues. The hook is good and the hook facts are properly cited in the article.  --  [[User:Daemonic Kangaroo|Daemonic Kangaroo]] ([[User talk:Daemonic Kangaroo|talk]]) 07:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:10, 24 July 2013

William Browne (died 1514)

Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 19:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg reviewed and DYK ready. Good work.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
There seems to be an inconsistency in the lead, where the date of death is given as 20 April 1488 whereas the infobox gives 3 June 1514. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. I've fixed it. And thanks to both you and BabbaQ for the reviews. NinaGreen (talk) 17:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Symbol redirect vote 4.svg The nomination needs a re-review based on the new issue. SL93 (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg Although I'm not convinced that my pointing out an error in the article created the need for a second review, I have now done this and made some minor edits to tidy up the referencing. I am happy to concur with the previous reviewer, that the article meets all the DYK criteria
  • the article was new when proposed, it is long enough, neutral, properly referenced with no close paraphrasing issues. The hook is good and the hook facts are properly cited in the article. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)