Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Worms Armageddon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Graeme Bartlett (good to go) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 6) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:32, 19 October 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Worms Armageddon==== | ====Worms Armageddon==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Worms Armageddon|Worms Armageddon}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Worms Armageddon|Worms Armageddon}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that GamesRadar ranked '''''[[Worms Armageddon]]''''' as number 13 in their list of the top 50 PlayStation 1 games of all time? <small>Source: "Best PS1 games of all time: 13. Worms Armageddon" (Page 39 of 52)</small> | * ... that GamesRadar ranked '''''[[Worms Armageddon]]''''' as number 13 in their list of the top 50 PlayStation 1 games of all time? <small>Source: "Best PS1 games of all time: 13. Worms Armageddon" (Page 39 of 52)</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mapenduma hostage crisis|Mapenduma hostage crisis]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mapenduma hostage crisis|Mapenduma hostage crisis]] | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Gamingforfun365|Gamingforfun365]] ([[User talk:Gamingforfun365|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) at 17:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Gamingforfun365|Gamingforfun365]] ([[User talk:Gamingforfun365|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) at 17:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was promoted to good article status in the time frame. It is also large enough, and all paragraphs are referenced. Correct person credited. QPQ was performed. At 114 characters hooks is short enough, and format looks OK. The detector cannot find a copyright infringement. YouTube dup credits Wikipedia. Hook is in article, with a cite, and source does have it. Good to go. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 07:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 05:33, 19 October 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Worms Armageddon
- ... that GamesRadar ranked Worms Armageddon as number 13 in their list of the top 50 PlayStation 1 games of all time? Source: "Best PS1 games of all time: 13. Worms Armageddon" (Page 39 of 52)
- Reviewed: Mapenduma hostage crisis
Improved to Good Article status by Gamingforfun365 (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 17:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC).
Article was promoted to good article status in the time frame. It is also large enough, and all paragraphs are referenced. Correct person credited. QPQ was performed. At 114 characters hooks is short enough, and format looks OK. The detector cannot find a copyright infringement. YouTube dup credits Wikipedia. Hook is in article, with a cite, and source does have it. Good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)