Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Yonne"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth |
imported>Biruitorul (tick) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] |
| − | + | :*The article is newly expanded. | |
| + | :*The article has not previously featured on the Main Page. | ||
| + | :*The article is long enough. | ||
| + | :*Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources. | ||
| + | :*No disputes surround the article. | ||
| + | :*I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation. | ||
| + | :*I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. I assume the wording is original. | ||
| + | :*I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account. | ||
| + | :*The article is not up for AfD. | ||
| + | :*I assume good faith as to the hook. I do have to note that there is much to dislike in the article as it stands: "from [[Socialist Party (France)]]" should be "from the [[Socialist Party (France)|Socialist Party]]", while the author really should decide on a valid citation format. "J. Robinson (ed) ''"The Oxford Companion to Wine"'' Third Edition pg 148–149 Oxford University Press 2006 ISBN 0-19-860990-6" is gibberish; if you are to use "cite book", at least use it consistently; ergo, {{cite book|editor=Robinson, J. |title= The Oxford Companion to Wine |year=2006|publisher= Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-860990-6 |page=148-49}} But yes, the hook does pass, as far as that's concerned. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 23:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:22, 9 October 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Yonne
- ... that the production of Chablis wine in the department of Yonne was devastated in the nineteenth century by powdery mildew, Phylloxera and the development of the railways?
- Reviewed: BK Chicken Fries
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC).

- The article is newly expanded.
- The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
- The article is long enough.
- Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
- No disputes surround the article.
- I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
- I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. I assume the wording is original.
- I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
- The article is not up for AfD.
- I assume good faith as to the hook. I do have to note that there is much to dislike in the article as it stands: "from Socialist Party (France)" should be "from the Socialist Party", while the author really should decide on a valid citation format. "J. Robinson (ed) "The Oxford Companion to Wine" Third Edition pg 148–149 Oxford University Press 2006 ISBN 0-19-860990-6" is gibberish; if you are to use "cite book", at least use it consistently; ergo, Robinson, J., ed. (2006). The Oxford Companion to Wine. Oxford University Press. p. 148-49. ISBN 0-19-860990-6. But yes, the hook does pass, as far as that's concerned. - Biruitorul Talk 23:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)