Difference between revisions of "Template:Facebook/doc"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hansen Sebastian
imported>Prince Oyelami Babatunde
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Documentation subpage}}
 
<!-- PLEASE ADD CATEGORIES AND INTERWIKIS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. -->
 
{{warning|The [[Wikipedia:External links|external links guideline]] recommends [[WP:ELNO|avoiding links to Facebook]] unless the profile is an [[WP:ELOFFICIAL|official account]], "controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article" '''and''' when the links to Facebook "provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites".  Wikipedia is not a directory for helping Facebook users find pages on Facebook.}}
 
  
==Usage==
+
Reinventing Network Management
{{See also|Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites}}
+
By Steve Broadhead on November 5, 2013 2:27 PM | No Comments | No TrackBacks
 +
Share on email Share on twitter Share on facebook Share on linkedin Share on slashdot Share on reddit Share on stumbleupon Share on digg Share on yammer | More Sharing ServicesMore
 +
Network management is the proverbial bus syndrome - nothing shows up forever and then there's a whole queue of them  - in this case interesting technologies, but here's the really interesting one I'm about to start testing with - Moogsoft.
  
<templatedata>
+
Think radical invention of network management and you're getting there - the name and website give some clues I guess that this isn't mainstream, me-too stuff...  
{
 
    "description": "Generate a link to a Facebook profile in a standard format.",
 
    "params": {
 
        "id": {
 
            "label": "Account ID",
 
            "description": "ID of the Facebook account (part of the web page address, for www.facebook.com/example/ the account id is \"example\").",
 
            "type": "string/line",
 
            "required": true,
 
            "aliases": ["1"]
 
        },
 
        "name": {
 
            "label": "Display name",
 
            "description": "Display name for the Facebook account",
 
            "type": "string/line",
 
            "required": false,
 
            "default": "Name of the page",
 
            "aliases": ["2"]
 
        }
 
    }
 
}
 
</templatedata>
 
  
== Examples ==
+
So here's the problem - network management, even in its modern incarnation of application performance monitoring and all the variations on a theme, is all about some concept of a network configuration being stable and predictable. So the idea is that you, over time, build up a "rich database" of information regarding all elements of the network - hardware and software - so that there's a level of intelligence to access when identifying problems (and potential problems). OK, except that, if you have a network deployment that is part cloud (or managed service of some description), part-virtualised and otherwise outsourced to some extent, how can you possibly know what the shape of that network is. Even as the service provider you cannot...
In this example, the Facebook user account is ''markzuckerberg'' and the description in the link is ''Mark Zuckerberg'':
 
  <nowiki>{{Facebook|markzuckerberg|Mark Zuckerberg}}</nowiki>
 
{{Facebook|markzuckerberg|Mark Zuckerberg}}
 
  
In this example, there's an ID instead of user name:
+
It therefore doesn't matter how much networking data you collect  - effectively you have to start from scratch every time, because the network is dynamic, not static, so any historical data is not necessarily correct. And we all know what happens in you make decisions based on inaccurate data... Moogsoft therefore says, forget about the existing methodologies - they don't work any longer. Instead it uses algorithm-based techniques to establish concurrent relationships between all aspects of the network when an anomalous situation is identified - looking at every possible cause-effect possibility. And it works in a true, collaborative environment - after all, network management is not detached from other aspects of the network in the same way that user A in department X is not detached from user B in department Y. So every "element" of the "network" is relevant and involved.
  <nowiki>{{Facebook|id=markzuckerberg/68310606562|name=Mark Zuckerberg}}</nowiki>
 
{{Facebook|id=markzuckerberg/68310606562|name=Mark Zuckerberg}}
 
  
===Links containing the {{=}} sign===
+
Sounds like an impossible to scale scenario? Well how about handling 170m incidents a day? And taking resolution time down from hours and days to minutes? Sounds too good to be true? Maybe so, but these are recorded results involving a famous, global Internet player.
Links to specific sections on a Facebook page may include the '=' symbol in the URL. For example, the string '?v=wall' would indicate the "Wall" section. Because '=' is a [[special character]] in Wikipedia template syntax, it cannot be used directly in the id. If you want the link to arrive at a specific section, use [[Template:=]] instead. For example, to link to the "Notes" section:
 
  
  <nowiki>{{Facebook|id=markzuckerberg/68310606562?v{{=}}notes|name=Mark Zuckerberg}}</nowiki>
+
Watch out for the Broadband-Testing report on the Moogsoft solution - should be somewhat interesting!!!! =
{{Facebook|id=markzuckerberg/68310606562?v{{=}}notes|name=Mark Zuckerberg}}
 
 
 
==See also==
 
*[[Template:Facebook Page]]
 
*[[Wikipedia:FACEBOOK]]
 
*{{tl|Facebook navbox}}
 
*{{tl|Google+}}
 
 
 
<includeonly>
 
<!-- PLEASE ADD CATEGORIES AND INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE, THANK YOU. -->
 
[[Category:Templates for linking to a social networking site|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
 
 
 
</includeonly>
 

Revision as of 12:19, 4 March 2014

Reinventing Network Management By Steve Broadhead on November 5, 2013 2:27 PM | No Comments | No TrackBacks Share on email Share on twitter Share on facebook Share on linkedin Share on slashdot Share on reddit Share on stumbleupon Share on digg Share on yammer | More Sharing ServicesMore Network management is the proverbial bus syndrome - nothing shows up forever and then there's a whole queue of them - in this case interesting technologies, but here's the really interesting one I'm about to start testing with - Moogsoft.

Think radical invention of network management and you're getting there - the name and website give some clues I guess that this isn't mainstream, me-too stuff...

So here's the problem - network management, even in its modern incarnation of application performance monitoring and all the variations on a theme, is all about some concept of a network configuration being stable and predictable. So the idea is that you, over time, build up a "rich database" of information regarding all elements of the network - hardware and software - so that there's a level of intelligence to access when identifying problems (and potential problems). OK, except that, if you have a network deployment that is part cloud (or managed service of some description), part-virtualised and otherwise outsourced to some extent, how can you possibly know what the shape of that network is. Even as the service provider you cannot...

It therefore doesn't matter how much networking data you collect - effectively you have to start from scratch every time, because the network is dynamic, not static, so any historical data is not necessarily correct. And we all know what happens in you make decisions based on inaccurate data... Moogsoft therefore says, forget about the existing methodologies - they don't work any longer. Instead it uses algorithm-based techniques to establish concurrent relationships between all aspects of the network when an anomalous situation is identified - looking at every possible cause-effect possibility. And it works in a true, collaborative environment - after all, network management is not detached from other aspects of the network in the same way that user A in department X is not detached from user B in department Y. So every "element" of the "network" is relevant and involved.

Sounds like an impossible to scale scenario? Well how about handling 170m incidents a day? And taking resolution time down from hours and days to minutes? Sounds too good to be true? Maybe so, but these are recorded results involving a famous, global Internet player.

Watch out for the Broadband-Testing report on the Moogsoft solution - should be somewhat interesting!!!! =