Difference between revisions of "Template:GAList"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Grondemar
(Updated to reflect addition of criteria 2d on copyvio and plagiarism.)
imported>Dcljr
(prevent exposed wikicode (caused by missing filename) when params are missing/empty -- seems like {GAList/check} should take care of this, but it doesn't)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{overcom|}}}|<hr width=50%>{{{overcom}}}|}}
 
{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{overcom|}}}|<hr width=50%>{{{overcom}}}|}}
 
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
 
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{1b}}}}}
+
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|{{{1a|neu}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{1b|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1com|}}}|{{{1com}}}|}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1com|}}}|{{{1com}}}|}}
 
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
 
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2a}}}}} b ''(citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2b}}}}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2c}}}}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2d}}}}}
+
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2a|neu}}}}} b ''(citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2b|neu}}}}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2c|neu}}}}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2d|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2com|}}}|{{{2com}}}|}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2com|}}}|{{{2com}}}|}}
 
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
 
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''([[WP:Out of scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{3a}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Article size|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{3b}}}}}
+
#:a ''([[WP:Out of scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{3a|neu}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Article size|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{3b|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{3com|}}}|{{{3com}}}|}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{3com|}}}|{{{3com}}}|}}
 
#It follows the '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
 
#It follows the '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|{{{4}}}}}
+
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|{{{4|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{4com|}}}|{{{4com}}}|}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{4com|}}}|{{{4com}}}|}}
 
#It is '''stable'''.
 
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|{{{5}}}}}
+
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|{{{5|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{5com|}}}|{{{5com}}}|}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{5com|}}}|{{{5com}}}|}}
 
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6a}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|appropriate use]] with [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6b}}}}}
+
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6a|neu}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|appropriate use]] with [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6b|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{6com|}}}|{{{6com}}}|}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{6com|}}}|{{{6com}}}|}}
 
#'''Overall''':  
 
#'''Overall''':  
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|{{{7}}}}}
+
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|{{{7|neu}}}}}
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{7com|}}}|{{{7com}}}|}}<!-- Template:GAList --><noinclude>
 
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{7com|}}}|{{{7com}}}|}}<!-- Template:GAList --><noinclude>
 
{{Documentation}}
 
{{Documentation}}
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 12:55, 11 April 2019

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

{{subst:GAList|1a=|1b=|2a=|2b=|2c=|2d=|3a=|3b=|4=|5=|6a=|6b=|7=}}

or, full usage:

{{subst:GAList
|overcom=
|1a=
|1b=
|1com=
|2a=
|2b=
|2c=
|2d=
|2com=
|3a=
|3b=
|3com=
|4=
|4com=
|5=
|5com=
|6a=
|6b=
|6com=
|7=
|7com=
}}

Available arguments are y,n and ?; some synonyms are also available for these arguments; any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark. Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.

The template also allows comments to be added to the top of the review, and also to each numbered item, using additional parameters
 overcom, 1com, 2com, ... 7com.
See the example below for usage.

Example

{{subst:GAList
|overcom=This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
|1a=y|1b=y
|2a=y|2b=n|2c=y|2d=y|2com=The sources are not sufficient to cover the controversial material in section 3
|3a=y|3b=y|4=?|4com=Is section 3 really neutral?
|5=y|6a=|6b=y|6com=I'm not convinced that the fair use rationale for the photograph in section 5 is valid
|7=n|7com= Good luck improving the article}}

results in:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    The sources are not sufficient to cover the controversial material in section 3
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Is section 3 really neutral?
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I'm not convinced that the fair use rationale for the photograph in section 5 is valid
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good luck improving the article

See also