Difference between revisions of "Template:GAstart"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SilkTork
(update)
imported>SilkTork
(media)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
#::  
 
#::  
 
#Does it '''contain  media such as images, [[Wikipedia:Images|images]], [[Wikipedia:Videos|video]], or audio ''' to illustrate the topic?
 
#Does it '''contain  media such as images, [[Wikipedia:Images|images]], [[Wikipedia:Videos|video]], or audio ''' to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are [[Wikipedia:File copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid fair use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|}}  
+
#:A. Media are [[Wikipedia:File copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid fair use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|}}  
 
#::  
 
#::  
#:B. Images are provided if possible and are [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Pertinence_and_encyclopedic_nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|}}
+
#:B. Media are provided if possible and are [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Pertinence_and_encyclopedic_nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|}}
 
#::
 
#::
  

Revision as of 11:23, 20 November 2019

I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements as I'm reading the article rather than list them here; if there is a lot of copy-editing to be done I may suggest getting a copy-editor (on the basis that a fresh set of eyes is helpful). Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria. SilkTork (talk)

Tick box

Symbol support vote.svg

GA review – see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for detailed criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. Prose is clear and concise, understandable, without spelling and grammar errors:
    B. Complies with MoS guidance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain media such as images, images, video, or audio to illustrate the topic?
    A. Media are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Media are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:


Comments on GA criteria

Pass


Query


Fail

General comments

Pass/Hold/Fail