Difference between revisions of "Template:List data structure comparison"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nyq
m (capitalized first word in column header to make it consistent with other headers)
(1/ URLs are broken (should be http://jcsites.juniata.edu/faculty/kruse/cs240/linkedlist2.htm), and also 2/ source is not relevant as the page only presents a table of algorithms' complexity without any explanations or justifications (it refers to a book chapter instead) -- I think this useless reference should therefore be removed.)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|{{nowrap|Insert/delete}} in middle
 
|{{nowrap|Insert/delete}} in middle
|style="background:#ffffdd"|search time + {{nowrap|Θ(1)}}<ref>Gerald Kruse. [http://www.juniata.edu/faculty/kruse/cs240/syllabus.htm CS 240 Lecture Notes]: [http://www.juniata.edu/faculty/kruse/cs240/linkedlist2.htm Linked Lists Plus: Complexity Trade-offs]. Juniata College. Spring 2008.</ref><ref>[http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/Keynote-Bjarne-Stroustrup-Cpp11-Style ''Day 1 Keynote - Bjarne Stroustrup: C++11 Style''] at ''GoingNative 2012'' on ''channel9.msdn.com'' from minute 45 or foil 44</ref><ref>[http://kjellkod.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/why-you-should-never-ever-ever-use-linked-list-in-your-code-again/ ''Number crunching: Why you should never, ever, EVER use linked-list in your code again''] at ''kjellkod.wordpress.com''</ref>
+
|style="background:#ffffdd"|search time + {{nowrap|Θ(1)}}<ref>[http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/Keynote-Bjarne-Stroustrup-Cpp11-Style ''Day 1 Keynote - Bjarne Stroustrup: C++11 Style''] at ''GoingNative 2012'' on ''channel9.msdn.com'' from minute 45 or foil 44</ref><ref>[http://kjellkod.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/why-you-should-never-ever-ever-use-linked-list-in-your-code-again/ ''Number crunching: Why you should never, ever, EVER use linked-list in your code again''] at ''kjellkod.wordpress.com''</ref>
 
|{{n/a}}
 
|{{n/a}}
 
|style="background:#ffdddd"|Θ(''n'')
 
|style="background:#ffdddd"|Θ(''n'')

Revision as of 00:46, 8 August 2018

Comparison of list data structures
Linked list Array Dynamic array Balanced tree Random access list Hashed array tree
Indexing Θ(n) Θ(1) Θ(1) Θ(log n) Θ(log n)[1] Θ(1)
Insert/delete at beginning Θ(1) N/A Θ(n) Θ(log n) Θ(1) Θ(n)
Insert/delete at end Θ(1) when last element is known;
Θ(n) when last element is unknown
N/A Θ(1) amortized Θ(log n) Θ(log n) updating Θ(1) amortized
Insert/delete in middle search time + Θ(1)[2][3] N/A Θ(n) Θ(log n) Θ(log n) updating Θ(n)
Wasted space (average) Θ(n) 0 Θ(n)[4] Θ(n) Θ(n) Θ(Template:Sqrt)

References

  1. Chris Okasaki (1995). "Purely Functional Random-Access Lists". Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architecture: 86–95. doi:10.1145/224164.224187.
  2. Day 1 Keynote - Bjarne Stroustrup: C++11 Style at GoingNative 2012 on channel9.msdn.com from minute 45 or foil 44
  3. Number crunching: Why you should never, ever, EVER use linked-list in your code again at kjellkod.wordpress.com
  4. Brodnik, Andrej; Carlsson, Svante; Sedgewick, Robert; Munro, JI; Demaine, ED (1999), Resizable Arrays in Optimal Time and Space (Technical Report CS-99-09) (PDF), Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo