Difference between revisions of "Template:AFC submission/comments/testcases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
blackwiki>Theopolisme (clear) |
blackwiki>DESiegel (add some cases) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{template test cases notice}} | {{template test cases notice}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | These are the possible automated comments when using the sandboxed version of {{tlx|AFC submission|D}} template: | ||
| + | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | ! code || Comment | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |rs || {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|rs}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |plot || {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|plot}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |film|| {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|film}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |test|| {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|test}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |redirect|| {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|redirect}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |essay|| {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|essay}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |web|| {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|web}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |corp|| {{AFC submission/comments/sandbox|corp}} | ||
| + | |} | ||
Revision as of 13:00, 29 July 2020
| 42px | This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:AFC submission/comments. Script error: No such module "Purge". to update the examples. If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki, see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page. You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses. You can test how this page looks in the different skins with these links: |
These are the possible automated comments when using the sandboxed version of {{AFC submission|D}} template:
| code | Comment |
|---|---|
| rs | This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. |
| plot | The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself. |
| film | This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |
| test | This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you. |
| redirect | This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you. |
| essay | This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. |
| web | This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |
| corp | This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |
Categories:
- Pages with script errors
- Pages with broken file links
- Template test cases
- AfC submissions declined as lacking reliable third-party sources
- AfC submissions declined as all plot
- AfC submissions declined as a non-notable film
- AfC submissions declined as a test
- AfC submissions declined as a redirect
- AfC submissions declined as an essay
- AfC submissions declined as non-notable web content
- AfC submissions declined as a non-notable organization