Difference between revisions of "Template:AMD Radeon Rx 200"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
blackwiki>FF9600 |
blackwiki>Logical user (Added an double precision gflop, as it was in line with the requirement (gcn). Check note 5.) |
||
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
| 28.8<br />? | | 28.8<br />? | ||
| 467.2<br />499.2 | | 467.2<br />499.2 | ||
| − | | | + | | 29.2 |
| 50 | | 50 | ||
| 12.0 (11_1)<ref name="AMD.com R5 2xx Spec List" /> | | 12.0 (11_1)<ref name="AMD.com R5 2xx Spec List" /> | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 3 March 2017
| Model | Launch | Codename | Architecture | Fab (nm) | Transistors (Million) | Die Size (mm2) | Bus interface | Clock rate | Core config[lower-alpha 1] | Fillrate | Memory | Processing Power (GFLOPS) |
TDP (W) | API support (version) | Release Price (USD) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core (MHz) | Boost (MHz) | Memory (MT/s) | Pixel (GP/s)[lower-alpha 2] | Texture (GT/s)[lower-alpha 3] | Size (MiB) | Bus width (bit) | Bus type | Bandwidth (GB/s) | Single Precision[lower-alpha 4] | Double Precision[lower-alpha 5] | Direct3D | OpenGL | OpenCL[lower-alpha 6] | Vulkan | |||||||||||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 210 (OEM) | Template:Unk | Cedar | Terascale 2 | 40 | 292 | 59 | PCIe 2.0 ×16 | 400 | Template:Unk | 900 | 80:8:4 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 256 | 64 | DDR3 | 7.2 | 64 | Template:N/A | 19 | 11.0 | 4.4 | 1.2 | N/A | Template:Unk |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 220 (OEM) | Template:Unk | Caicos PRO-L | Terascale 2 | 40 | 370 | 67 | PCIe 2.0 ×16 | 625 | 650 | 1066 | 80:8:4[1] | 2.5 | 5 | 1024 | 64 | DDR3 | 8.53 | 200 | Template:N/A | 18 | 11.0[1] | 4.4 | 1.2 | N/A | Template:Unk |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 230 | 3 April 2014[2] | Caicos Pro | Terascale 2 | 40 | 370 | 67 | PCIe 2.0 ×16 | 625[3] | Template:N/A | 1066 | 160:8:4 | 2.5 | 5 | 1024 2048 |
64 | DDR3 | 8.53 | 200 | Template:N/A | 19[4] | 11.0[1] | 4.4 | 1.2 | N/A | Template:Unk |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 235 (OEM) | Template:Unk | Caicos XT | Terascale 2 | 40 | 370 | 67 | PCIe 2.0 ×16 | 775 | Template:Unk | 1800 | 160:8:4 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 1024 | 64 | DDR3 | 14.4 | 248 | Template:N/A | 35[5] | 11.0[1] | 4.4 | 1.2 | N/A | Template:Unk |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 235X (OEM) | Template:Unk | Caicos XT | Terascale 2 | 40 | 370 | 67 | PCIe 2.1 ×16 | 875 | Template:Unk | 1800 | 160:8:4 | 3.5 | 7.0 | 1024 | 64 | DDR3 | 14.4 | 280 | Template:N/A | 18 | 11.0[1] | 4.4 | 1.2 | N/A | Template:Unk |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 240 (OEM) | 1 November 2013[6] | Oland | GCN 1st gen | 28 | 1040 | 90 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 | 730 | 780 | 1800 ? |
320:20:8 | 5.84 | 14.6 | 1024 2048 |
128 | DDR3 GDDR5 |
28.8 ? |
467.2 499.2 |
29.2 | 50 | 12.0 (11_1)[1] | 4.5 | 1.2[7][8] | 1.0 | Template:Unk |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 240 | 8 August 2013 | Oland PRO | GCN 1st gen | 28 | 1040 | 90 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 | 730 | 780 | 1800 4500 |
320:20:8 | 5.84 | 14.6 | 2048 | 128 | DDR3 GDDR5 |
28.8 72 |
467.2 499.2 |
29.2 | 30 | 12.0 (11_1)[9] | 4.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $69 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 250 | 8 August 2013 | Oland XT | GCN 1st gen | 28 | 1040 | 90 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 | 1000 | 1050 | 1800 4600 |
384:24:8 | 8 | 24 | 1024 2048 |
128 | DDR3 GDDR5 |
73.6 | 768 806.4 |
48 | 75 | 12.0 (11_1)[9] | 4.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $89 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 250E[10] | 21 December 2013 | Cape Verde PRO | GCN 1st gen | 28 | 1500 | 123 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 800 | N/A | 4500 | 512:32:16 | 12.8 | 25.6 | 1024 2048 |
128 | GDDR5 | 72 | 819.2 | 51.2 | 55 | 12.0 (11_1) | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | Template:Unknown |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 250X | 10 February 2014 | Cape Verde XT | GCN 1st gen | 28 | 1500 | 123 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 1000 | Template:N/A | 4500 | 640:40:16 | 16 | 40 | 1024 2048 |
128 | GDDR5 | 72 | 1280 | 80 | 95 | 12.0 (11_1)[9] | 4.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $99 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 260 | 17 December 2013 | Bonaire | GCN 2nd gen | 28 | 2080 | 160 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 1000 | Template:N/A | 6000 | 768:48:16 | 16 | 48 | 1024 | 128 | GDDR5 | 96 | 1536 | 96 | 95 | 12.0 (12_0)[9] | 4.3 | 2.0[7][8] | 1.0 | $109 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 260X | 8 August 2013 | Bonaire XTX | GCN 2nd gen | 28 | 2080 | 160 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 1100 | Template:N/A | 6500 | 896:56:16 | 17.6 | 61.6 | 1024 2048 |
128 | GDDR5 | 104 | 1971.2 | 123.2 | 115 | 12.0 (12_0)[9] | 4.5[11] | 2.1[11] | 1.0 | $139 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 265 | 13 February 2014 | Curaçao PRO (Pitcairn PRO) |
GCN 1st gen | 28 | 2800 | 212 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 900 | 925 | 5600 | 1024:64:32 | 28.8 | 57.6 | 2048 | 256 | GDDR5 | 179.2 | 1843.2 | 115.2 | 150 | 12.0 (11_1)[9] | 4.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $149 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 270 | 13 November 2013 | Curaçao PRO (Pitcairn XT) |
GCN 1st gen | 28 | 2800 | 212 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 900 | 925 | 5600 | 1280:80:32 | 28.8 | 72 | 2048 | 256 | GDDR5 | 179.2 | 2304 2368 |
144 148 |
150 | 12.0 (11_1)[12] | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $179 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 270X | 8 August 2013 | Curaçao XT (Pitcairn XT) |
GCN 1st gen | 28 | 2800 | 212 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 1000 | 1050 | 5600 | 1280:80:32 | 32 | 80 | 2048 4096 |
256 | GDDR5 | 179.2 | 2560 2688 |
160 168 |
180 | 12.0 (11_1)[12] | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $199 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 280 | 4 March 2014 | Tahiti PRO | GCN 1st gen | 28 | 4313 | 352 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 827 | 933 | 5000 | 1792:112:32 | 26.5 | 92.6 | 3072 | 384 | GDDR5 | 240 | 2964 3343.9 |
741 836 |
250 | 12.0 (11_1)[12] | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $249 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 280X | 8 August 2013 | Tahiti XT2 Tahiti XTL[13] |
GCN 1st gen | 28 | 4313 | 352 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 850 | 1000 | 6000 | 2048:128:32 | 27.2–32 | 109–128 | 3072 | 384 | GDDR5 | 288 | 3481.6 4096 |
870.4 1024 |
250 | 12.0 (11_1)[12] | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | $299 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 285 | 2 September 2014 | Tonga PRO | GCN 3rd gen | 28 | 5000[14] | 359[14] | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 918 | Template:N/A | 5500 | 1792:112:32 | 29.4 | 102.8 | 2048 | 256 | GDDR5 | 176[lower-alpha 7] | 3290 | 206.6[16] | 190 | 12.0 (12_0)[12] | 4.5 | 2.0[7][8] | 1.0 | $249 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 290 | 5 November 2013 | Hawaii PRO | GCN 2nd gen | 28 | 6200[17] | 438 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | up to 947[lower-alpha 8] | Template:N/A | 5000 | 2560:160:64 | 60.608 | 151.52 | 4096 | 512 | GDDR5 | 320 | 4848.6 | 606.1 | 250[19] | 12.0 (12_0)[12] | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | $399 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 290X | 24 October 2013 | Hawaii XT | GCN 2nd gen | 28 | 6200[17] | 438 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | up to 1000[lower-alpha 8] | Template:N/A | 5000 | 2816:176:64 | 64 | 176 | 4096 8192 |
512 | GDDR5 | 320 | 5632 | 704 | 250[19] | 12.0 (12_0)[12] | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | $549 |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 295X2[20] | 8 April 2014 | Vesuvius | GCN 2nd gen | 28 | 2× 6200 | 2× 438 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | 1018 | Template:N/A | 5000 | 2× 2816:176:64 | 2× 65.152 | 2× 179.168 | 2× 4096 | 2× 512 | GDDR5 | 2× 320 | 2× 5733.376 | 2× 716.672 | 500 | 12.0 (12_0)[12] | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | $1499 |
| Model | Launch | Codename | Architecture | Fab (nm) | Transistors (Million) | Die Size (mm2) | Bus interface | Core (MHz) | Boost (MHz) | Memory (MT/s) | Core config[lower-alpha 1] | Pixel (GP/s)[lower-alpha 2] | Texture (GT/s)[lower-alpha 3] | Size (MiB) | Bus width (bit) | Bus type | Bandwidth (GB/s) | Single Precision[lower-alpha 4] | Double Precision[lower-alpha 5] | TDP (W) | Direct3D | OpenGL | OpenCL[lower-alpha 6] | Vulkan | Release Price (USD) |
| Clock rate | Fillrate | Memory | Processing Power (GFLOPS) |
API support (version) | |||||||||||||||||||||
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Unified Shaders : Texture Mapping Units : Render Output Units
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of ROPs multiplied by the base core clock speed.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of TMUs multiplied by the base core clock speed.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Single precision performance is calculated as two times the number of shaders multiplied by the base core clock speed.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Double precision performance is 1/16 of the single precision performance on GCN 3rd gen,[21][22] 1/2 on GCN 2nd gen (capped to 1/8 on high-end consumer Radeon cards, and 1/16 on mid- and entry-level cards),[23][24] and 1/4 on GCN 1st gen (capped to 1/16 on mid- and entry-level cards).[25]
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Support for OpenCL 2.0 has been extended to the 200 Series' R7 and R9 models.[7]
- ↑ The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1st gen and 2nd gen cards) in certain situations.[14][15]
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Base clock of R9 290 and R9 290X will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.[18]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/oem/r5
- ↑ btarunr (3 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ↑ http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r5
- ↑ Wiles, Debbie (4 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market". CPU-World.com. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 "AMD OpenCL 2.0 Driver". Advanced Micro Devices. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 "MD5 Checksums, System Requirements & Driver Compatibility". Advanced Micro Devices. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r7
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R7 250E". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 [1]
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r9
- ↑ Mujtaba, Hassan (26 October 2013). "AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Sandhu, Tarinder (2 September 2014). "Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga)". Hexus. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Hruska, Joel (2 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3rd gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia's GTX 760". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (10 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC". AnandTech. Purch Group. p. 17. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Smith, Ryan (24 October 2013). "The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
- ↑ Angelini, Chris (5 November 2013). "AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent?". Tom's Hardware. Purch Group. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Moammer, Khalid (21 June 2015). "AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
- ↑ Shilov, Anton (4 April 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs". KitGuru. Korona Solutions. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (2 July 2015). "The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming for the Top". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (10 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
- ↑ Angelini, Chris (23 October 2013). "Radeon R9 290X Review AMD's Back In Ultra-High-End Gaming". Tom's Hardware. Purch Group. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (2 July 2015). "The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming For the Top". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (22 December 2011). "AMD Radeon HD 7970 Review: 28nm And Graphics Core Next, Together As One". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 13 December 2015.