Difference between revisions of "Template:AMD Radeon Rx 200"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Not clear if GCN 1.0 supports Vulkan 1.1) |
blackwiki>Wikiinger |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
! colspan=4 | Memory | ! colspan=4 | Memory | ||
! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]]) | ! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]]) | ||
| − | |||
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ||
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD) | ! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD) | ||
| Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]]) | ! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]]) | ||
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 210<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Cedar) | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 210<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Cedar) | ||
| Line 38: | Line 33: | ||
| 3.2 | | 3.2 | ||
| 64 | | 64 | ||
| − | | | + | | {{N/A}} |
| − | + | | DDR3<br />64 | |
| 256 | | 256 | ||
| 900 | | 900 | ||
| 7.2 | | 7.2 | ||
| 19 | | 19 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| rowspan=5 | PCIe 2.1 ×16 | | rowspan=5 | PCIe 2.1 ×16 | ||
| OEM | | OEM | ||
| Line 59: | Line 50: | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| 200 | | 200 | ||
| + | | {{N/A}} | ||
| + | | DDR3<br />64 | ||
| 1024 | | 1024 | ||
| 1066 | | 1066 | ||
| Line 72: | Line 65: | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| 200 | | 200 | ||
| + | | {{N/A}} | ||
| + | | DDR3<br />64 | ||
| 1024<br />2048 | | 1024<br />2048 | ||
| 1066 | | 1066 | ||
| Line 85: | Line 80: | ||
| 6.2 | | 6.2 | ||
| 248 | | 248 | ||
| + | | {{N/A}} | ||
| + | | DDR3<br />64 | ||
| 1024 | | 1024 | ||
| 1800 | | 1800 | ||
| Line 98: | Line 95: | ||
| 7.0 | | 7.0 | ||
| 280 | | 280 | ||
| + | | {{N/A}} | ||
| + | | DDR3<br />64 | ||
| 1024 | | 1024 | ||
| 1800 | | 1800 | ||
| Line 119: | Line 118: | ||
| 28.8<br />? | | 28.8<br />? | ||
| 50 | | 50 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| rowspan=3 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 | | rowspan=3 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 | ||
| OEM | | OEM | ||
| Line 201: | Line 198: | ||
| 96 | | 96 | ||
| 95 | | 95 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| $109 | | $109 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 236: | Line 230: | ||
| 179.2 | | 179.2 | ||
| 150 | | 150 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| $149 | | $149 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 317: | Line 308: | ||
| 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}} | | 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}} | ||
| 190 | | 190 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| $249 | | $249 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 385: | Line 373: | ||
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ||
! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]]) | ! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]]) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ||
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD) | ! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD) | ||
| Line 396: | Line 380: | ||
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]]) | ! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]]) | ||
! colspan=4 | Memory | ! colspan=4 | Memory | ||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 11:45, 29 April 2018
| Model (Codename) |
Launch | Architecture (Fab) |
Transistors Die Size |
Core | Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] | Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4] (GFLOPS) |
Memory | TBP (W) | Bus interface | Release Price (USD) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Config[lower-alpha 5] | Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) | Texture (GT/s) | Pixel (GP/s) | Single | Double | Bus type & width (bit) |
Size (MiB) | Clock (MT/s) | Band- width (GB/s) | |||||||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 210[1] (Cedar) |
Template:Unk | Terascale 2 (40 nm) |
Template:Val 59 mm2 |
80:8:4 | 400 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 64 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64 |
256 | 900 | 7.2 | 19 | PCIe 2.1 ×16 | OEM |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 220[1] (Caicos Pro) |
Template:Unk | Template:Val 67 mm2 |
80:8:4 | 625 650 |
2.5 | 5 | 200 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64 |
1024 | 1066 | 8.53 | 18 | OEM | ||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 230[2] (Caicos Pro) |
April 3, 2014[3] | 160:8:4 | 625 | 2.5 | 5 | 200 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64 |
1024 2048 |
1066 | 8.53 | 19[4] | Template:Unk | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 235[1] (Caicos XT) |
Template:Unk | 160:8:4 | 775 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 248 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64 |
1024 | 1800 | 14.4 | 35[5] | OEM | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 235X[1] (Caicos XT) |
Template:Unk | 160:8:4 | 875 | 3.5 | 7.0 | 280 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64 |
1024 | 1800 | 14.4 | 18 | OEM | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R5 240[1] (Oland) |
November 1, 2013[6] | GCN 1st gen (28 nm) |
Template:Val 90 mm2 |
320:20:8 | 730 780 |
5.84 | 14.6 | 467.2 499.2 |
29.2 | DDR3 GDDR5 128 |
1024 2048 |
1800 ? |
28.8 ? |
50 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 | OEM |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 240[7] (Oland Pro) |
August 8, 2013 | 320:20:8 | 730 780 |
5.84 | 14.6 | 467.2 499.2 |
29.2 | DDR3 GDDR5 128 |
2048 | 1800 4500 |
28.8 72 |
30 | $69 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 250[7] (Oland XT) |
August 8, 2013 | 384:24:8 | 1000 (1050) |
8 | 24 | 768 806.4 |
48 | DDR3 GDDR5 128 |
1024 2048 |
1800 4600 |
73.6 | 75 | $89 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 250E[8] (Cape Verde Pro) |
December 21, 2013 | Template:Val 123 mm2 |
512:32:16 | 800 | 12.8 | 25.6 | 819.2 | 51.2 | GDDR5 128 |
1024 2048 |
4500 | 72 | 55 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | Template:Unknown | |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 250X[7] (Cape Verde XT) |
February 10, 2014 | 640:40:16 | 1000 | 16 | 40 | 1280 | 80 | GDDR5 128 |
1024 2048 |
4500 | 72 | 95 | $99 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 260[7] (Bonaire) |
December 17, 2013 | GCN 2nd gen (28 nm) |
Template:Val 160 mm2 |
768:48:16 | 1000 | 16 | 48 | 1536 | 96 | GDDR5 128 |
1024 | 6000 | 96 | 95 | $109 | |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 260X[7] (Bonaire XTX) |
August 8, 2013 | 896:56:16 | 1100 | 17.6 | 61.6 | 1971.2 | 123.2 | GDDR5 128 |
1024 2048 |
6500 | 104 | 115 | $139 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R7 265[7] (Pitcairn Pro) |
February 13, 2014 | GCN 1st gen (28 nm) |
Template:Val 212 mm2 |
1024:64:32 | 900 925 |
28.8 | 57.6 | 1843.2 | 115.2 | GDDR5 256 |
2048 | 5600 | 179.2 | 150 | $149 | |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 270[9] (Pitcairn XT) |
November 13, 2013 | 1280:80:32 | 900 925 |
28.8 | 72 | 2304 2368 |
144 148 |
GDDR5 256 |
2048 | 5600 | 179.2 | 150 | $179 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 270X)[9] (Pitcairn XT) |
August 8, 2013 | 1280:80:32 | 1000 1050 |
32 | 80 | 2560 2688 |
160 168 |
GDDR5 256 |
2048 4096 |
5600 | 179.2 | 180 | $199 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 280[9] (Tahiti Pro) |
March 4, 2014 | Template:Val 352 mm2 |
1792:112:32 | 827 933 |
26.5 | 92.6 | 2964 3343.9 |
741 836 |
GDDR5 384 |
3072 | 5000 | 240 | 250 | $249 | ||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 280X[9] (Tahiti XTL)[10] |
August 8, 2013 | 2048:128:32 | 850 1000 |
27.2–32 | 109–128 | 3481.6 4096 |
870.4 1024 |
GDDR5 384 |
3072 | 6000 | 288 | 250 | $299 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 285[9] (Tonga Pro) |
September 2, 2014 | GCN 3rd gen (28 nm) |
Template:Val 359 mm2[11] |
1792:112:32 | 918 | 29.4 | 102.8 | 3290 | 206.6[12] | GDDR5 256 |
2048 | 5500 | 176[lower-alpha 6] | 190 | $249 | |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 290[9] (Hawaii Pro) |
November 5, 2013 | GCN 2nd gen (28 nm) |
Template:Val 438 mm2[14] |
2560:160:64 | up to 947[lower-alpha 7] | 60.608 | 151.52 | 4848.6 | 606.1 | GDDR5 512 |
4096 | 5000 | 320 | 250[16] | $399 | |
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 290X[9] (Hawaii XT) |
October 24, 2013 | 2816:176:64 | 1000[lower-alpha 7] | 64 | 176 | 5632 | 704 | GDDR5 512 |
4096 8192 |
5000 | 320 | 250[16] | $549 | |||
| Template:Rh | Radeon R9 295X2[9][17] (Vesuvius) |
April 8, 2014 | 2× Template:Val 2× 438 mm2 |
2× 2816:176:64 | 1018 | 2× 65.152 | 2× 179.168 | 2× 5733.376 | 2× 716.672 | GDDR5 512 |
2× 4096 | 5000 | 2× 320 | 500 | $1499 | ||
| Model (Codename) |
Launch | Architecture (Fab) |
Transistors Die Size |
Config[lower-alpha 5] | Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) | Pixel (GP/s) | Texture (GT/s) | Single | Double | Bus type & width (bit) |
Size (MiB) | Clock (MT/s) | Band- width (GB/s) |
TBP (W) | Bus interface | Release Price (USD) |
| Core | Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] | Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4] (GFLOPS) |
Memory | |||||||||||||
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in italic.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of Texture Mapping Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of Render Output Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a FMA operation.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Unified Shaders : Texture Mapping Units : Render Output Units
- ↑ The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1st gen and 2nd gen cards) in certain situations.[11][13]
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Base clock of R9 290 and R9 290X will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.[15]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | OEM | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
- ↑ "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
- ↑ btarunr (3 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ↑ Wiles, Debbie (4 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market". CPU-World.com. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 "Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R7 250E". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 "Radeon™ R9 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
- ↑ Mujtaba, Hassan (26 October 2013). "AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Sandhu, Tarinder (2 September 2014). "Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga)". Hexus. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (10 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC". AnandTech. Purch Group. p. 17. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Hruska, Joel (2 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3rd gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia's GTX 760". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (24 October 2013). "The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
- ↑ Angelini, Chris (5 November 2013). "AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent?". Tom's Hardware. Purch Group. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Moammer, Khalid (21 June 2015). "AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
- ↑ Shilov, Anton (4 April 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs". KitGuru. Korona Solutions. Retrieved 6 April 2014.