Difference between revisions of "Template:Adult model"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
blackwiki>Fayenatic london
m (take CommonsCat back out of template)
blackwiki>Fayenatic london
(expand, based on discussion at User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This [[Wikipedia:Category|category]] contains [[model (person)|models]] who appear in adult-oriented materials (not models who are merely [[adult]]s).
 
This [[Wikipedia:Category|category]] contains [[model (person)|models]] who appear in adult-oriented materials (not models who are merely [[adult]]s).
 +
 +
The meaning of the term is not well-defined, and it may have derogatory connotations. Relevant Wikipedia policies include:
 +
*[[WP:CAT|Categories must "be based on essential, 'defining' features of article subjects."]] This category is part of a structure defined in terms of occupation; the fact that a model has done some [[Glamour photography|"glamour" work]] does not establish an occupation as an "adult model".
 +
*[[WP:BLP|"The case for each category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources" and "Caution should be used with categories that suggest a person has a poor reputation"]].
 +
''Therefore this category should not be used for mainstream models, but only for performers whose work is clearly of a hardcore "adult" nature.''
 +
 +
<noinclude>[[Category:Category namespace templates]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 17:19, 26 April 2010

This category contains models who appear in adult-oriented materials (not models who are merely adults).

The meaning of the term is not well-defined, and it may have derogatory connotations. Relevant Wikipedia policies include:

Therefore this category should not be used for mainstream models, but only for performers whose work is clearly of a hardcore "adult" nature.