Difference between revisions of "Template:Africa PR-instructions"
blackwiki>AbstractIllusions (→Requesting a review: Fix nominating instructions to be in line with current template) |
blackwiki>Funandtrvl (add cat) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
=== Requesting a review === | === Requesting a review === | ||
| − | # Add <code><nowiki>peer-review=yes</nowiki></code> to the {{tl|Africa | + | # Add <code><nowiki>peer-review=yes</nowiki></code> to the {{tl|WikiProject Africa}} banner at the top of the article's talk page. If the page doesn't have a banner, add <nowiki>{{WikiProject Africa |peer-review=yes }}</nowiki>. |
# From there, click on the "is currently undergoing" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article. | # From there, click on the "is currently undergoing" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article. | ||
# Place <code><nowiki>=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===</nowiki></code> at the top. | # Place <code><nowiki>=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===</nowiki></code> at the top. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates|featured article candidate]]. To archive a review: | Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates|featured article candidate]]. To archive a review: | ||
| − | # Replace <code><nowiki>peer-review=yes</nowiki></code> with <code><nowiki>old-peer-review=yes</nowiki></code> in the {{tl|Africa | + | # Replace <code><nowiki>peer-review=yes</nowiki></code> with <code><nowiki>old-peer-review=yes</nowiki></code> in the {{tl|WikiProject Africa}} banner template at the top of the article's talk page |
# Move <code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia:Africa-related regional notice board/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}</nowiki></code> from this page to the [[Wikipedia:Africa-related regional notice board/Peer review/{{CURRENTYEAR}}|current archive page]]. | # Move <code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia:Africa-related regional notice board/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}</nowiki></code> from this page to the [[Wikipedia:Africa-related regional notice board/Peer review/{{CURRENTYEAR}}|current archive page]]. | ||
<small>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikipedia:Peer review|action=purge}} Purge server cache]</small> | <small>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikipedia:Peer review|action=purge}} Purge server cache]</small> | ||
| − | |} | + | |}<noinclude> |
| + | [[Category:WikiProject Africa templates]] | ||
| + | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 1 August 2014
|
Wikipedia's Africa Peer review process exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors, and is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work, often as a way of preparing a featured article candidate. It is not academic peer review by a group of experts in a particular subject, and articles that undergo this process should not be assumed to have greater authority than any other. For feedback on articles that are less developed, use the article's talk page or requests for feedback. For general editing advice, see Wikipedia style guidelines, Wikipedia how-to, "How to write a great article", and "The perfect article". Articles that need extensive basic editing should be directed to Pages needing attention, Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment. |
The path to a featured article |
|
Nomination procedure Anyone can request peer review for Africa-related articles. The best way to get lots of reviews is to reply promptly and appreciatively on this page to any comments. If you post a request, please do not discourage reviewers by ignoring their efforts. To add a nomination: Requesting a review
If an article is listed for a second (or third, and so forth) peer review:
If you also want to transclude the subpage to a non-Africa peer review subpage:
Responding to a requestEveryone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ArchivingReviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
| |