Difference between revisions of "Template:Almanac"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
blackwiki>Rich Farmbrough m (Add code for incorrectly substed templates, or minor tidy up using AWB) |
blackwiki>MSGJ (use new functionality of ambox) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{ambox | |
| + | | subst = <includeonly>{{subst:</includeonly><includeonly>substcheck}}</includeonly> | ||
| type = style | | type = style | ||
| text = This article concentrates unduly on statistical information. '''[[WP:NOT#STATS|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]''' and long lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles.<br /><small>In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader.</small> ([[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|Discuss]]) | | text = This article concentrates unduly on statistical information. '''[[WP:NOT#STATS|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]''' and long lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles.<br /><small>In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader.</small> ([[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|Discuss]]) | ||
| − | + | | name = Almanac | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 16:01, 25 February 2011
This article concentrates unduly on statistical information. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and long lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader. (Discuss) |