Difference between revisions of "Template:ArbCom Pseudoscience"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
blackwiki>Pauli133
m (fixing lint errors)
blackwiki>Pipetricker
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{discretionary sanctions|topic=cf|style=long}}
 
{{discretionary sanctions|topic=cf|style=long}}
 
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
 
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|{{anchor|Notice}}<center><big>'''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience|Arbitration Committee Decisions on Pseudoscience]]'''</big></center>
+
|{{anchor|Notice}}
 +
<div style="text-align:center"><big>'''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience|Arbitration Committee Decisions on Pseudoscience]]'''</big></div>
  
 
The [[WP:ARB|Arbitration Committee]] has issued [[Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Arbitration_cases|several principles]] which may be helpful to editors of this and other articles when dealing with subjects and categories related to "[[pseudoscience]]".
 
The [[WP:ARB|Arbitration Committee]] has issued [[Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Arbitration_cases|several principles]] which may be helpful to editors of this and other articles when dealing with subjects and categories related to "[[pseudoscience]]".
  
;Principles
+
'''Principles'''
  
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Fringe_science#Scientific_focus|Scientific focus]]:''' [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]] and its content on scientific and quasi-scientific topics will primarily reflect current mainstream [[scientific consensus]].
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Fringe_science#Scientific_focus|Scientific focus]]:''' [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]] and its content on scientific and quasi-scientific topics will primarily reflect current mainstream [[scientific consensus]].
Line 11: Line 12:
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Serious_encyclopedias|Serious encyclopedias]]:''' Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Serious_encyclopedias|Serious encyclopedias]]:''' Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
  
;Four groups
+
'''Four groups'''
  
 
* '''1. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Obvious_pseudoscience|Obvious pseudoscience]]:''' Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus may be so labeled and [[:Category:Pseudoscience|categorized as such]] without more justification.
 
* '''1. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Obvious_pseudoscience|Obvious pseudoscience]]:''' Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus may be so labeled and [[:Category:Pseudoscience|categorized as such]] without more justification.

Revision as of 17:44, 24 February 2019

The Arbitration Committee has issued several principles which may be helpful to editors of this and other articles when dealing with subjects and categories related to "pseudoscience".

Principles

Four groups

===  Standardised Arbitration Enforcement (AE) templates ===

This section transcluded from: Template:Ds/topics/single notice [edit] [DS template subpages]