Difference between revisions of "Template:Caduceus confusion summary"
imported>Khajidha |
imported>Wzyboy m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{main|Caduceus as a symbol of medicine}} | {{main|Caduceus as a symbol of medicine}} | ||
| − | [[File:US Army Medical Corps Branch Plaque.gif|thumb|upright=0.8|The [[Medical Corps (United States Army)|US Army Medical Corps]] Branch Plaque. The adoption, in 1902, of the caduceus for US Army medical officer uniforms popularized the use of the symbol throughout the medical field in the United States.]] | + | [[File:US Army Medical Corps Branch Plaque.gif|thumb|upright=0.8|The [[Medical Corps (United States Army)|US Army Medical Corps]] Branch Plaque. The adoption, in 1902, of the caduceus for US Army medical officer uniforms popularized the (mis)use of the symbol throughout the medical field in the United States.]] |
{{#if: {{{1|}}}|[[File:Rod of Asclepius2.svg|thumb|right|upright={{{1|}}}|[[Rod of Asclepius]]]]}} | {{#if: {{{1|}}}|[[File:Rod of Asclepius2.svg|thumb|right|upright={{{1|}}}|[[Rod of Asclepius]]]]}} | ||
Revision as of 09:08, 20 November 2018
It is relatively common, especially in the United States, to find the caduceus, with its two snakes and wings, used as a symbol of medicine instead of the Rod of Asclepius, with only a single snake. This usage was popularised largely as a result of the adoption of the caduceus as its insignia by the U.S. Army Medical Corps in 1902 at the insistence of a single officer (though there are conflicting claims as to whether this was Capt. Frederick P. Reynolds or Col. John R. van Hoff).[1][2]
The Rod of Asclepius is the dominant symbol for professional healthcare associations in the United States. One survey found that 62% of professional healthcare associations used the rod of Asclepius as their symbol.[3] The same survey found that 76% of commercial healthcare organizations used the Caduceus symbol. The author of the study suggests the difference exists because professional associations are more likely to have a real understanding of the two symbols, whereas commercial organizations are more likely to be concerned with the visual impact a symbol will have in selling their products.
The long-standing and abundantly attested historical associations of the caduceus with commerce are considered by many to be inappropriate in a symbol used by those engaged in the healing arts.[2] This has occasioned significant criticism of the use of the caduceus in a medical context.
| “ | Template:Trim quotes | ” |
| — Stuart L. Tyson, "The Caduceus", in The Scientific Monthly[4] | ||
- ↑ F.H. Garrison, "The Use of the Caduceus in the Insignia of the Army Medical Officer", in Bull. Med. Lib. Assoc. IX (1919-20), 13-16
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Engle, Bernice (Dec 1929). "The Use of Mercury's Caduceus as a Medical Emblem"". The Classical Journal. 25 (1): 205.
- ↑ Friedlander, Walter J (1992). The Golden Wand of Medicine: A History of the Caduceus symbol in medicine. Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-28023-1.
- ↑ Tyson, Stuart L (1932). "The Caduceus". Scientific Monthly. 34 (6): 495.