Difference between revisions of "Template:Caselist undue influence"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Legis
(correction)
imported>Legis
(adding Hammond v Osborn)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
| case10 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=[[Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2)]] |court=UKHL |division= |year=2001 |num=41 |date= }}
 
| case10 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=[[Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2)]] |court=UKHL |division= |year=2001 |num=41 |date= }}
 
| case11 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=National Westminster Bank plc v Amin |court=UKHL |division= |year=2002 |num=9 |date= }}
 
| case11 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=National Westminster Bank plc v Amin |court=UKHL |division= |year=2002 |num=9 |date= }}
| case12 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=National Commercial Bank of Jamaica v Hew |court=UKPC |division= |year=2003 |num=51 |date= }}
+
| case12 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=Hammond v Osborn|court=EWCA |division=Civ |year=2002 |num=885}}
| case13 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=Pesticcio v Huet |court=EWCA |division=Civ |year=2004 |num=372 |date=}}
+
| case13 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=National Commercial Bank of Jamaica v Hew |court=UKPC |division= |year=2003 |num=51 |date= }}
| case14 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=[[Thompson v Foy]]|court=EWHC|division=Ch|year=2009|num=1076}}
+
| case14 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=Pesticcio v Huet |court=EWCA |division=Civ |year=2004 |num=372 |date=}}
 +
| case15 = {{cite BAILII|litigants=[[Thompson v Foy]]|court=EWHC|division=Ch|year=2009|num=1076}}
 
| notes    = see [[Undue influence in English law]]
 
| notes    = see [[Undue influence in English law]]
 
}}<noinclude>[[Category:Caselist templates]] [[Category:Contract caselist templates]]</noinclude>
 
}}<noinclude>[[Category:Caselist templates]] [[Category:Contract caselist templates]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 14:44, 29 April 2016