Difference between revisions of "Template:Copying within Wikipedia"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cerejota
(category add)
imported>Cerejota
(repurpose)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
----
 
----
  
This template is intended to be placed on an article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to warn editors of possible intentional or unintentional violations of [[WP:GFDL]] due to cut and paste of material form other articles.
+
This template is intended to be placed on an article to warn editors of possible intentional or unintentional violations of [[WP:GFDL]] due to cut and paste of material form other articles, for purpose of fixing.
  
It adds the main page to [[:Category:Possible GFDL violations]]
+
It adds the article to [[:Category:Possible GFDL violations]].
  
 
'''Usage''':
 
'''Usage''':
Line 25: Line 25:
 
*[[Template:Notice-history-incomplete-multi]] - More than one origin page (not implemented yet)
 
*[[Template:Notice-history-incomplete-multi]] - More than one origin page (not implemented yet)
  
 +
*[[Template:Notice-histincomp-talk-resolved]] - For when this tag is removed from main page due to resolution of issues
  
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Revision as of 23:03, 19 August 2007

Stop hand.svg
This article's edit history is not complete. Some of the article text's edit history exists at a different location due to copying and pasting between articles. This may be a violation of the GFDL if proper attribution was not made in an edit summary or on the talk page. Please see Wikipedia:Merge and Wikipedia:How to break up a page for details of when such copying and pasting is acceptable and when it is not, and how to correctly attribute using links in the edit summaries.




This template is intended to be placed on an article to warn editors of possible intentional or unintentional violations of WP:GFDL due to cut and paste of material form other articles, for purpose of fixing.

It adds the article to Category:Possible GFDL violations.

Usage:

  1. {{Notice-history-incomplete|MAINPAGENAME}} - if the original page is not named, highly unrecommended, but allows for quick tagging while the source article is found.
  2. {{Notice-history-incomplete|MAINPAGENAME|ORIGINPAGE}} - if the original page is named, highly recommended to use this format. For single origin only.


See also