Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/110 North Wacker"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius
(cmt)
imported>John M Wolfson
(Done)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* ... that '''[[110 North Wacker]]''' is the tallest all-commercial building in Chicago since 1990?  <small>Source: "As proposed, the skyscraper will be the tallest purely commercial building to rise in the Windy City since Two Prudential Plaza was constructed in 1990." [https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/5/9/15568970/chicago-skyscraper-facts-110-n-wacker]; if suboptimal perhaps [https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/ryan-ori/ct-biz-bank-of-america-tower-construction-ryan-ori-20191001-2r5662heajeb7izeyedr2iqh7a-story.html this] can also verify.</small>
 
* ... that '''[[110 North Wacker]]''' is the tallest all-commercial building in Chicago since 1990?  <small>Source: "As proposed, the skyscraper will be the tallest purely commercial building to rise in the Windy City since Two Prudential Plaza was constructed in 1990." [https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/5/9/15568970/chicago-skyscraper-facts-110-n-wacker]; if suboptimal perhaps [https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/ryan-ori/ct-biz-bank-of-america-tower-construction-ryan-ori-20191001-2r5662heajeb7izeyedr2iqh7a-story.html this] can also verify.</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[110 North Wacker]]''' replaced a building that was eligible for the [[National Register of Historic Places]]?  <small>Source: "The Illinois Historic Preservation Agency in August determined the [predecessor] building's architecture makes it eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44521212/51story_tower_needs_federal_ok/]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[110 North Wacker]]''' replaced a building that was eligible for the [[National Register of Historic Places]]?  <small>Source: "The Illinois Historic Preservation Agency in August determined the [predecessor] building's architecture makes it eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44521212/51story_tower_needs_federal_ok/]</small>
** '''ALT2''':... that economics resulted in '''[[110 North Wacker]]''' technically violating an ordinance on air clearance of riverwalks? <small>Source: "A City of Chicago-mandated ordinance requiring a riverwalk component to be “open to the sky above” would have made the redevelopment of the narrow, trapezoidal parcel cost-prohibitive if interpreted to the exact letter of the rule. To make the project feasible, a compromise was reached allowing the building to overhang the riverfront public space 55 feet overhead." [https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/5/9/15568970/chicago-skyscraper-facts-110-n-wacker]</small>
+
** '''ALT2''':... that cost considerations resulted in '''[[110 North Wacker]]''' technically violating an ordinance on air clearance of riverwalks? <small>Source: "A City of Chicago-mandated ordinance requiring a riverwalk component to be “open to the sky above” would have made the redevelopment of the narrow, trapezoidal parcel cost-prohibitive if interpreted to the exact letter of the rule. To make the project feasible, a compromise was reached allowing the building to overhang the riverfront public space 55 feet overhead." [https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/5/9/15568970/chicago-skyscraper-facts-110-n-wacker]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Liberty County Jail|Liberty County Jail]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Liberty County Jail|Liberty County Jail]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:John M Wolfson|John M Wolfson]] ([[User talk:John M Wolfson|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:John M Wolfson|John M Wolfson]] ([[User talk:John M Wolfson|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC).</small>

Revision as of 01:36, 19 February 2020

110 North Wacker

  • ... that 110 North Wacker is the tallest all-commercial building in Chicago since 1990? Source: "As proposed, the skyscraper will be the tallest purely commercial building to rise in the Windy City since Two Prudential Plaza was constructed in 1990." [1]; if suboptimal perhaps this can also verify.
    • ALT1:... that 110 North Wacker replaced a building that was eligible for the National Register of Historic Places? Source: "The Illinois Historic Preservation Agency in August determined the [predecessor] building's architecture makes it eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. [2]
    • ALT2:... that cost considerations resulted in 110 North Wacker technically violating an ordinance on air clearance of riverwalks? Source: "A City of Chicago-mandated ordinance requiring a riverwalk component to be “open to the sky above” would have made the redevelopment of the narrow, trapezoidal parcel cost-prohibitive if interpreted to the exact letter of the rule. To make the project feasible, a compromise was reached allowing the building to overhang the riverfront public space 55 feet overhead." [3]

Created by John M Wolfson (talk). Self-nominated at 01:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

  • I have fixed the sentence starting with a number. As for ALT2, perhaps we can substitute "cost considerations" for "economics". – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 21:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
    • Template:Re Sounds good. If you can just make that change for ALT2, then that should be good to go as well. epicgenius (talk) 01:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)