Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/17th Lok Sabha"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DiplomatTesterMan (review) |
imported>Dharmadhyaksha (re) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*'''Review:''' According to the DYK check tool the article passes 5x expansion check with expansion beginning on August 28, 2019. Accordingly date of nomination is ok. The article is well formatted and a glance over it also seems to be well referenced with notable publications. The [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=17th+Lok+Sabha&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 copyvio tool check] is ok. QPQ added. | :*'''Review:''' According to the DYK check tool the article passes 5x expansion check with expansion beginning on August 28, 2019. Accordingly date of nomination is ok. The article is well formatted and a glance over it also seems to be well referenced with notable publications. The [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=17th+Lok+Sabha&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 copyvio tool check] is ok. QPQ added. | ||
::The first hook is nice, but nevertheless I would just like to suggest that an alternate hook is also added. [[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DiplomatTesterMan]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 10:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC) | ::The first hook is nice, but nevertheless I would just like to suggest that an alternate hook is also added. [[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DiplomatTesterMan]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 10:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :::Thanks {{ping|DiplomatTesterMan}} for the review. Following are other possible hooks: | |
+ | :::*'''ALT1''': ... that [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] politicians [[Maneka Gandhi]] and [[Santosh Gangwar]], current members of the '''[[17th Lok Sabha]]''', have been elected to the [[Lok Sabha|Indian lower house]] for the eighth time? | ||
+ | :::*'''ALT2''': ... that of the 545 members of the '''[[17th Lok Sabha]]''', 300 are first-time members and 197 have been elected second time consecutively? | ||
+ | :::Although there are more possible and better hooks related to criminal charges and declared assets, i am not sure if the negative aspects such as these should presented in hook per [[WP:DYK|DYK rules, Eligibility criteria #4]]. §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|<i style="color:#E0115F"><b>Dharmadhyaksha</b></i>]]§§ <small>{[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|Edits]]}</small> 05:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 05:11, 3 September 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
17th Lok Sabha
- ... that with a total of 78, which is nearly 14%, the 17th Lok Sabha has the maximum number of women politicians ever elected to the Indian lower house? Source: "At 14%, 17th Lok Sabha has highest number of women MPs
5x expanded by Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Self-nominated at 11:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC).
- Review: According to the DYK check tool the article passes 5x expansion check with expansion beginning on August 28, 2019. Accordingly date of nomination is ok. The article is well formatted and a glance over it also seems to be well referenced with notable publications. The copyvio tool check is ok. QPQ added.
- The first hook is nice, but nevertheless I would just like to suggest that an alternate hook is also added. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 10:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Template:Ping for the review. Following are other possible hooks:
- ALT1: ... that Bharatiya Janata Party politicians Maneka Gandhi and Santosh Gangwar, current members of the 17th Lok Sabha, have been elected to the Indian lower house for the eighth time?
- ALT2: ... that of the 545 members of the 17th Lok Sabha, 300 are first-time members and 197 have been elected second time consecutively?
- Although there are more possible and better hooks related to criminal charges and declared assets, i am not sure if the negative aspects such as these should presented in hook per DYK rules, Eligibility criteria #4. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Template:Ping for the review. Following are other possible hooks: