Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1903 FA Cup Final"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cbl62 (tweak) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|1903 FA Cup Final}} | {{DYK header|1903 FA Cup Final}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1903 FA Cup Final|1903 FA Cup Final}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=1903 FA Cup Final|1903 FA Cup Final}} | ||
| − | {{main page image/DYK|image=CrystalPalace1905.jpg|caption=[[Crystal Palace National Sports Centre|Crystal Palace Stadium in 1905]]}} | + | {{main page image/DYK|image=CrystalPalace1905.jpg|caption=[[Crystal Palace National Sports Centre|Crystal Palace Stadium in 1905]]}} |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that, during the '''[[1903 FA Cup Final]]''', a [[cinematograph]] was sited on top of one of the stands? <small>Source: Bury Football Club, "1900 & 1903 FA Cup Winners" ([https://www.buryfc.co.uk/history2/1900--1903/]).</small> | * ... that, during the '''[[1903 FA Cup Final]]''', a [[cinematograph]] was sited on top of one of the stands? <small>Source: Bury Football Club, "1900 & 1903 FA Cup Winners" ([https://www.buryfc.co.uk/history2/1900--1903/]).</small> | ||
** <s>'''ALT1''':... that [[Bury F.C.|Bury]] and [[Derby County F.C.|Derby County]], who met in the '''[[1903 FA Cup Final]]''', had identical win-loss records in [[1902–03_in_English_football#First_Division|that season's league championship]] competition?</s> <small>Source: English Football League Tables, "Season 1902–03" ([http://www.englishfootballleaguetables.co.uk/final/f1902-03.html#d1]).</small> | ** <s>'''ALT1''':... that [[Bury F.C.|Bury]] and [[Derby County F.C.|Derby County]], who met in the '''[[1903 FA Cup Final]]''', had identical win-loss records in [[1902–03_in_English_football#First_Division|that season's league championship]] competition?</s> <small>Source: English Football League Tables, "Season 1902–03" ([http://www.englishfootballleaguetables.co.uk/final/f1902-03.html#d1]).</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': Exempt from QPQ (2 DYK credits), but have reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rhus garwellii|Rhus garwellii]] | :* ''Reviewed'': Exempt from QPQ (2 DYK credits), but have reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rhus garwellii|Rhus garwellii]] | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:No Great Shaker|No Great Shaker]] ([[User talk:No Great Shaker|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:No Great Shaker|No Great Shaker]] ([[User talk:No Great Shaker|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Promoted to GA status within past 7 days. Article is long enough and within policy (neutral, inline citations). Spot-checking found no close paraphrasing or copyvio. Both of the proposed hooks are short enough. The lead hook is interesting enough (not so much with the "alt 1" hook). The lead hook fact is neutral and accurate and cited supported by an inline citation. Exempt from QPQ but did one anyway. Image has licensing indicating <s>fair use</s> public domain. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 04:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | * [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Promoted to GA status within past 7 days. Article is long enough and within policy (neutral, inline citations). Spot-checking found no close paraphrasing or copyvio. Both of the proposed hooks are short enough. The lead hook is interesting enough (not so much with the "alt 1" hook). The lead hook fact is neutral and accurate and cited supported by an inline citation. Exempt from QPQ but did one anyway. Image has licensing indicating <s>fair use</s> public domain. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 04:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | {{-}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 05:42, 19 September 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
1903 FA Cup Final
- ... that, during the 1903 FA Cup Final, a cinematograph was sited on top of one of the stands? Source: Bury Football Club, "1900 & 1903 FA Cup Winners" ([1]).
ALT1:... that Bury and Derby County, who met in the 1903 FA Cup Final, had identical win-loss records in that season's league championship competition?Source: English Football League Tables, "Season 1902–03" ([2]).
- Reviewed: Exempt from QPQ (2 DYK credits), but have reviewed Rhus garwellii
Improved to Good Article status by No Great Shaker (talk). Self-nominated at 21:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC).
- 16px Promoted to GA status within past 7 days. Article is long enough and within policy (neutral, inline citations). Spot-checking found no close paraphrasing or copyvio. Both of the proposed hooks are short enough. The lead hook is interesting enough (not so much with the "alt 1" hook). The lead hook fact is neutral and accurate and cited supported by an inline citation. Exempt from QPQ but did one anyway. Image has licensing indicating
fair usepublic domain. Cbl62 (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC)