Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1942 Betteshanger miners' strike"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>AleatoryPonderings (respond; de-indent convo) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 1) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from June 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | |2 | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|1942 Betteshanger miners' strike}} | {{DYK header|1942 Betteshanger miners' strike}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1942 Betteshanger miners' strike|1942 Betteshanger miners' strike}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=1942 Betteshanger miners' strike|1942 Betteshanger miners' strike}} | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
| − | {{main page image|image=Miners Statue near the roundabout on the A258 (geograph 2410793).jpg|caption=Statue of a miner at Betteshanger|width=160 | + | {{main page image|image=Miners Statue near the roundabout on the A258 (geograph 2410793).jpg|caption=Statue of a miner at Betteshanger|width=160 }} |
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that negotiations to end the '''[[1942 Betteshanger miners' strike]]''' took place at [[HM Prison Maidstone|Maidstone Prison]] as three union officials had been imprisoned there? <small>"At the end of the trial, the three union leaders, considered to be the instigators of the strike, were sentenced to hard labour in prison ... On 28 January 1942, an agreement was reached to end the strike. The negotiations took place in Maidstone prison, in the presence of the three strike leaders, David Rhys Grenfell (Secretary for Mines) and Ebby Edwards (secretary of the Mineworkers’ Federation of Great Britain)." from: {{cite journal |last1=Mak |first1=Ariane |title=Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Betteshanger Miners’ Strike: An Essay in Historical Ethnography |journal=Historical Studies in Industrial Relations |issue=36 |pages=29–57 |url=https://www.academia.edu/16126163/Spheres_of_Justice_in_the_1942_Betteshanger_Miners_Strike_An_Essay_in_Historical_Ethnography |date=2015|language=en |issn=1362-1572}}</small> | * ... that negotiations to end the '''[[1942 Betteshanger miners' strike]]''' took place at [[HM Prison Maidstone|Maidstone Prison]] as three union officials had been imprisoned there? <small>"At the end of the trial, the three union leaders, considered to be the instigators of the strike, were sentenced to hard labour in prison ... On 28 January 1942, an agreement was reached to end the strike. The negotiations took place in Maidstone prison, in the presence of the three strike leaders, David Rhys Grenfell (Secretary for Mines) and Ebby Edwards (secretary of the Mineworkers’ Federation of Great Britain)." from: {{cite journal |last1=Mak |first1=Ariane |title=Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Betteshanger Miners’ Strike: An Essay in Historical Ethnography |journal=Historical Studies in Industrial Relations |issue=36 |pages=29–57 |url=https://www.academia.edu/16126163/Spheres_of_Justice_in_the_1942_Betteshanger_Miners_Strike_An_Essay_in_Historical_Ethnography |date=2015|language=en |issn=1362-1572}}</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that of the 1,085 men fined for taking part in the '''[[1942 Betteshanger miners' strike]]''', only 9 paid up? <small>"The 35 miners on no. 2 coalface were fined £3 each and 1,050 other miners fined £1, ... Despite the risk of two to four weeks’ imprisonment, only nine miners had paid their fines four months after the strike. Nothing happened." from: {{cite journal |last1=Mak |first1=Ariane |title=Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Betteshanger Miners’ Strike: An Essay in Historical Ethnography |journal=Historical Studies in Industrial Relations |issue=36 |pages=29–57 |url=https://www.academia.edu/16126163/Spheres_of_Justice_in_the_1942_Betteshanger_Miners_Strike_An_Essay_in_Historical_Ethnography |date=2015|language=en |issn=1362-1572}}</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that of the 1,085 men fined for taking part in the '''[[1942 Betteshanger miners' strike]]''', only 9 paid up? <small>"The 35 miners on no. 2 coalface were fined £3 each and 1,050 other miners fined £1, ... Despite the risk of two to four weeks’ imprisonment, only nine miners had paid their fines four months after the strike. Nothing happened." from: {{cite journal |last1=Mak |first1=Ariane |title=Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Betteshanger Miners’ Strike: An Essay in Historical Ethnography |journal=Historical Studies in Industrial Relations |issue=36 |pages=29–57 |url=https://www.academia.edu/16126163/Spheres_of_Justice_in_the_1942_Betteshanger_Miners_Strike_An_Essay_in_Historical_Ethnography |date=2015|language=en |issn=1362-1572}}</small> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 14: | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Polish invasion of Czech Republic]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Polish invasion of Czech Republic]] | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* {{DYK checklist | :* {{DYK checklist | ||
| Line 26: | Line 19: | ||
|newness = y | |newness = y | ||
|length = y | |length = y | ||
| − | |eligibilityother = | + | |eligibilityother = |
|sourced = y | |sourced = y | ||
|neutral = y | |neutral = y | ||
|plagiarismfree = y | |plagiarismfree = y | ||
| − | |policyother = | + | |policyother = |
|hookcited = y | |hookcited = y | ||
|hookinterest = y | |hookinterest = y | ||
| − | |hookother = | + | |hookother = |
|picfree = y | |picfree = y | ||
|picused = y | |picused = y | ||
| Line 44: | Line 37: | ||
:Thanks [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]], I've looked through the JSTOR article you provided but I don't think there's anything useful there (it summarises the events in a paragraph and is only mentioned in relation to a later case where imprisonment resulted in walkouts). I would happily have reviewed the Polish-Czech relations article for DYK as part of that QPQ but it wasn't to be. I don't mind using one of the other QPQs if desired. Glad you enjoyed the article! - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 15:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC) | :Thanks [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]], I've looked through the JSTOR article you provided but I don't think there's anything useful there (it summarises the events in a paragraph and is only mentioned in relation to a later case where imprisonment resulted in walkouts). I would happily have reviewed the Polish-Czech relations article for DYK as part of that QPQ but it wasn't to be. I don't mind using one of the other QPQs if desired. Glad you enjoyed the article! - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 15:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|Dumelow}} All good re: the article I cited – the coverage did look quite minimal. As for QPQ, no need to use another in my view – makes sense that events intervened to moot that review. All good from my perspective! [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]] ([[User talk:AleatoryPonderings|talk]]) 16:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Dumelow}} All good re: the article I cited – the coverage did look quite minimal. As for QPQ, no need to use another in my view – makes sense that events intervened to moot that review. All good from my perspective! [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]] ([[User talk:AleatoryPonderings|talk]]) 16:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | {{-}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 20:13, 2 July 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
1942 Betteshanger miners' strike
Statue of a miner at Betteshanger
Statue of a miner at Betteshanger
- ... that negotiations to end the 1942 Betteshanger miners' strike took place at Maidstone Prison as three union officials had been imprisoned there? "At the end of the trial, the three union leaders, considered to be the instigators of the strike, were sentenced to hard labour in prison ... On 28 January 1942, an agreement was reached to end the strike. The negotiations took place in Maidstone prison, in the presence of the three strike leaders, David Rhys Grenfell (Secretary for Mines) and Ebby Edwards (secretary of the Mineworkers’ Federation of Great Britain)." from: Mak, Ariane (2015). "Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Betteshanger Miners' Strike: An Essay in Historical Ethnography". Historical Studies in Industrial Relations (36): 29–57. ISSN 1362-1572.
- ALT1:... that of the 1,085 men fined for taking part in the 1942 Betteshanger miners' strike, only 9 paid up? "The 35 miners on no. 2 coalface were fined £3 each and 1,050 other miners fined £1, ... Despite the risk of two to four weeks’ imprisonment, only nine miners had paid their fines four months after the strike. Nothing happened." from: Mak, Ariane (2015). "Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Betteshanger Miners' Strike: An Essay in Historical Ethnography". Historical Studies in Industrial Relations (36): 29–57. ISSN 1362-1572.
- ALT2:... that the 1942 Betteshanger strike was the only one at a British coal mine during the Second World War? "Betteshanger was the only pit to strike during the Second World War." from; "Betteshanger Colliery". Dover Museum. Retrieved 26 June 2020.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 15:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thanks AleatoryPonderings, I've looked through the JSTOR article you provided but I don't think there's anything useful there (it summarises the events in a paragraph and is only mentioned in relation to a later case where imprisonment resulted in walkouts). I would happily have reviewed the Polish-Czech relations article for DYK as part of that QPQ but it wasn't to be. I don't mind using one of the other QPQs if desired. Glad you enjoyed the article! - Dumelow (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping All good re: the article I cited – the coverage did look quite minimal. As for QPQ, no need to use another in my view – makes sense that events intervened to moot that review. All good from my perspective! AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}